Does competition for (human) capital discipline governments? The role of commitment
We argue that labor mobility does not lead to a ''race to the bottom,'' where countries drastically cut redistributive transfers in order to attract skilled workers. The basis of our argument is that these cuts are not credible policies. We propose a two country model where competition for mobile factors is limited to credible policies. Both countries end up with positive redistribution, and the country with a technological advantage can sustain more redistribution. The model can address the interaction of redistribution and migration policies. In particular, we show that when countries have similar skill endowments but different technologies, migration policies enabling unskilled labor mobility lead to higher global welfare than policies enabling skilled labor mobility
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||03 Dec 2006|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.EconomicDynamics.org/society.htm
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed006:547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christian Zimmermann)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.