IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rdg/repxwp/rep-wp2004-07.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Liquidity In Commercial Property Markets: Deconstructing The Transaction Process

Author

Listed:
  • Neil Crosby

    (Department of Real Estate & Planning, University of Reading Business School)

  • Patrick McAllister

    (Department of Real Estate & Planning, University of Reading Business School)

Abstract

This paper draws from a wider research programme in the UK undertaken for the Investment Property Forum examining liquidity in commercial property. One aspect of liquidity is the process by which transactions occur including both how properties are selected for sale and the time taken to transact. The paper analyses data from three organisations; a property company, a major financial institution and an asset management company, formally a major public sector pension fund. The data covers three market states and includes sales completed in 1995, 2000 and 2002 in the UK. The research interviewed key individuals within the three organisations to identify any common patterns of activity within the sale process and also identified the timing of 187 actual transactions from inception of the sale to completion. The research developed a taxonomy of the transaction process. Interviews with vendors indicated that decisions to sell were a product of a combination of portfolio, specific property and market based issues. Properties were generally not kept in a 'readiness for sale' state. The average time from first decision to sell the actual property to completion had a mean time of 298 days and a median of 190 days. It is concluded that this study may underestimate the true length of the time to transact for two reasons. Firstly, the pre-marketing period is rarely recorded in transaction files. Secondly, and more fundamentally, studies of sold properties may contain selection bias. The research indicated that vendors tended to sell properties which it was perceived could be sold at a 'fair' price in a reasonable period of time.

Suggested Citation

  • Neil Crosby & Patrick McAllister, 2004. "Liquidity In Commercial Property Markets: Deconstructing The Transaction Process," Real Estate & Planning Working Papers rep-wp2004-07, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
  • Handle: RePEc:rdg:repxwp:rep-wp2004-07
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.reading.ac.uk/LM/LM/fulltxt/0704.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tim A. Kroencke & Felix Schindler & Bertram I. Steininger, 2018. "The Anatomy of Public and Private Real Estate Return Premia," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 500-523, April.
    2. John Henneberry & Claire Roberts, 2008. "Calculated Inequality? Portfolio Benchmarking and Regional Office Property Investment in the UK," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(5-6), pages 1217-1241, May.
    3. Gianluca Marcato, 2018. "Liquidity Pricing of Illiquid Assets," ERES eres2018_215, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    4. David Higgins, 2017. "Does the risk match the returns: an examination of US commercial property market data," ERES eres2017_397, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    5. John Henneberry & Fotis Mouzakis, 2014. "Familiarity and the Determination of Yields for Regional Office Property Investments in the UK," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(3), pages 530-546, March.
    6. Steven Devaney & Roberto Martinez Diaz, 2011. "Transaction based indices for the UK commercial real estate market: an exploration using IPD transaction data," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 269-289, June.
    7. Shaun Bond & Soosung Hwang & Zhenguo Lin & Kerry Vandell, 2007. "Marketing Period Risk in a Portfolio Context: Theory and Empirical Estimates from the UK Commercial Real Estate Market," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 447-461, May.
    8. Elias Oikarinen & Martin Hoesli & Camilo Serrano, 2013. "Do Public Real Estate Returns Really Lead Private Returns?," ERES eres2013_145, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    9. Gert Abraham Lowies & Christiaan Ernst Cloete, 2013. "The Influence of Frame Dependence on Investment Decisions made by Listed Property Fund Managers in South Africa," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 5(11), pages 805-814.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rdg:repxwp:rep-wp2004-07. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marie Pearson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bsrdguk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.