IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Models and Multipliers

Listed author(s):
  • P.D. Jonson

    (Reserve Bank of Australia)

  • W.J. McKibbin

    (Reserve Bank of Australia)

  • R.G. Trevor

    (Reserve Bank of Australia)

Can expansionary budgetary policy boost employment? Ten years ago almost every economist would have answered “yes” to this question. Now there is an important conflict in the debate on economic policy. The conflict is between the results of theoretical and empirical multiplier analysis on the one hand and, on the other, beliefs of policy advisers about the need for tight budgetary policies which help to bear down on inflation despite uncomfortably high unemployment. This paper examines this issue with the aid of the RBA79 model of the Australian economy. The usual versions of this model (and all others in existence) have fiscal multipliers for output and employment which are positive for many years. The paper shows that it is relatively simple to adjust the assumptions of the model so that increases in real government spending produce increases in output and employment for only a couple of years. In the process, considerable inflation is generated, and this has strong adverse effects on activty in the medium term. The assumptions examined are associated with the reaction of inflation to increases in government spending and the effects of inflation and/or increases in government spending on demand and supply in the goods market. The approach consists of changing selected parameters in the model, in directions dictated by economic theory and a priori reasoning. Simulation analysis is then used to explore the implications of changing these assumptions. In short, RBA79 with changed assumptions produces results more in line with the intuitions of policy makers than the results of other models. The most interesting aspect of this is that the revised assumptions may be more appropriate for current conditions than the assumptions used in conventional multiplier analysis.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Reserve Bank of Australia in its series RBA Research Discussion Papers with number rdp8006.

in new window

Date of creation: Sep 1980
Handle: RePEc:rba:rbardp:rdp8006
Contact details of provider: Postal:
GPO Box 3947, Sydney NSW 2001

Phone: 61-2-9551-8111
Fax: 61-2-9551-8000
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rba:rbardp:rdp8006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Paula Drew)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.