IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qed/wpaper/421.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Capacity Constraints and Destructive Competition in the Extraction of Non-Renewable Natural Resources

Author

Listed:
  • Nancy Olewiler

Abstract

Capacity and minimum efficient scale constraints are examined in the extraction of a non-renewable natural resource. These constraints can lead to destructive competition. If this occurs, a perfect foresight equilibrium will not exist because the set of intertemporal shadow prices for the resource will not be sustainable by competitive behaviour of firms. Each firm's extraction path is affected and there are regions where the market price of the resource is constant. Possible time paths of momentary equilibria are derived when firms expectations are incorrect. Examples are policy implications are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Nancy Olewiler, 1981. "Capacity Constraints and Destructive Competition in the Extraction of Non-Renewable Natural Resources," Working Paper 421, Economics Department, Queen's University.
  • Handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:421
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eswaran, Mukesh & Lewis, Tracy R & Heaps, Terry, 1983. "On the Nonexistence of Market Equilibria in Exhaustible Resource Markets with Decreasing Costs," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 91(1), pages 154-167, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Babcock (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.