IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qed/dpaper/21.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

High-Grading In Metalliferous Ore Bodies - The Economist’S Persperctive

Author

Listed:
  • Glenn Jenkins

    (Queen's University, Kingston, On, Canada)

  • ROBERT CONRAD
  • MALCOLM GILLIS

Abstract

As economists with some experience in mineral economics and the analysis of mining tax policy in several countries, it has been with some interest that we have followed the recent exchange between Thomas and Alduck in Mining Magazine regarding the economic effects of "high-grading". It is our purpose in this paper to contribute an economist’s perspective to the problem of grade management, and to comment upon several points of the Thomas and Walduck contributions which we believe to be unclear or erroneous.

Suggested Citation

  • Glenn Jenkins & ROBERT CONRAD & MALCOLM GILLIS, 1977. "High-Grading In Metalliferous Ore Bodies - The Economist’S Persperctive," Development Discussion Papers 1977-03, JDI Executive Programs.
  • Handle: RePEc:qed:dpaper:21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cri-world.com/publications/qed_dp_21.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Turfa, A.F. & Connor, J.N.L. & Thijsse, B.J. & Beenakker, J.J.M., 1985. "A classical dynamics study of Senftleben-Beenakker effects in nitrogen gas," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 129(3), pages 439-454.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    minerals; high-grading;

    JEL classification:

    • Q32 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation - - - Exhaustible Resources and Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:dpaper:21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Babcock (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.