IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pri/esocpu/40.html

Democratic Backsliding Damages Foreign Public Support for Security Cooperation

Author

Listed:
  • Rikio Inouye

    (Princeton University)

  • Yusaku Horiuchi

    (Florida State University)

  • Eun A Jo

    (William and Mary)

  • Kelly Matush

    (Florida State University)

Abstract

Does democratic backsliding shape foreign public preferences for security cooperation with the backsliding state? Existing studies suggest that US backsliding reduces favorability abroad but leaves support for other foreign policy initiatives largely unchanged. In this note, we argue that this evidence comes from “least likely†domains: the risks citizens face on these issues are relatively independent of a partner country’s backsliding. We instead study intelligence sharing, a form of security cooperation that is directly vulnerable to erosion of trust, procedures, and shared values. A preregistered survey experiment with nearly 6,000 respondents across the United States’ Five Eyes partners shows that information about democratic backsliding in a partner country consistently reduces public support for intelligence sharing. Domestic political deterioration can weaken the public foundations of international collaboration, with far-reaching implications for security cooperation and alliance cohesion.

Suggested Citation

  • Rikio Inouye & Yusaku Horiuchi & Eun A Jo & Kelly Matush, 2025. "Democratic Backsliding Damages Foreign Public Support for Security Cooperation," Empirical Studies of Conflict Project (ESOC) Working Papers 40, Empirical Studies of Conflict Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:pri:esocpu:40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://esoc.princeton.edu/publications/wp40
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H56 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - National Security and War

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pri:esocpu:40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bobray Bordelon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.