IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pre/wpaper/202625.html

Exchange Rate and Industrial Policies as a Means of Technological Learning in Africa: Which Institutional Framework to Embrace? Developmental State, Heterogeneous Coalition, or Neoliberal Coalition

Author

Listed:
  • Samson Gebrerufael

    (Department of Economics, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, South Africa)

  • Renee van Eyden

    (Department of Economics, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, South Africa)

  • Rangan Gupta

    (Department of Economics, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, South Africa)

Abstract

This paper empirically evaluates the technological learning trajectory models of Porcile et al. (2023) across African countries categorized into three institutional regimes: developmental (Ethiopia, Mauritius, Rwanda), conflicting claims (Ghana, Kenya, Namibia, Tunisia), and neoliberal (Seychelles, South Africa). Using panel ARDL modeling, the study investigates the impact of real effective exchange rate (REER) depreciation on technological learning-by-doing, proxied by the growth rate of export income elasticity (GIEX). The results show no significant learning effects in the developmental regime due to immediate equilibrium adjustment and insignificant coefficients of REER depreciation. The conflicting claims regime demonstrates the same results, driven by low-complexity export baskets. Conversely, the neoliberal regime achieves a relatively persistent short-lived technological learning. However, its long-run REER growth coefficient is negative, confirming that over-reliance on price competitiveness retards long-run growth per Thirlwall's law. Ultimately, state failure hinders heavy intervention regimes in Africa, whereas moving toward the neoliberal framework yields better short-run learning outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Samson Gebrerufael & Renee van Eyden & Rangan Gupta, 2026. "Exchange Rate and Industrial Policies as a Means of Technological Learning in Africa: Which Institutional Framework to Embrace? Developmental State, Heterogeneous Coalition, or Neoliberal Coalition," Working Papers 202625, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:pre:wpaper:202625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://drupalwebprod-files.up.ac.za/Public/2026-09/202625.pdf?VersionId=yCdfocf9GvgHYd1sSqezQQA3cEzlstAm
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F41 - International Economics - - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance - - - Open Economy Macroeconomics
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • O47 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output Convergence
    • O11 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
    • O43 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Institutions and Growth
    • P48 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - Legal Institutions; Property Rights; Natural Resources; Energy; Environment; Regional Studies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pre:wpaper:202625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rangan Gupta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/decupza.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.