IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/91050.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Paradox of international (non)recognition: the relationship between de facto states and patron states

Author

Listed:
  • Meydan, Vildan

Abstract

International system has been witnessing some jeopolitical mobilization after the second half of 20. century. These mobilities result in several conflicts which demand secession from their parent state. The conflicts which are caused by secessionist movements usually end with unilaterally secessions and these entities establish their own state without consent of parent state. After decolonization era, these secessionist movements are regarded as illegal by international community because they are not as part of decolonization movements. So these entities remain as unrecognized, in other words, de facto states. The violation of territorial integrity principle and threat to international peace and stability are main reasons that these states are regarded as illegal. But de facto states can’t achieve their statehood without a support from external sources. While external sources, in other words patron states support de facto states from several aspects, they also have a control on these entities. De facto states which are not recognized by international community also exprerience isolation politics. These isolationism make de facto state dependent on patron state’s support. But these dependences take de facto states away from international recognition. So in this study, it is aimed to analyze the relationship between de facto states and patron states and how this relationship evolves around a vicious circle.

Suggested Citation

  • Meydan, Vildan, 2018. "A Paradox of international (non)recognition: the relationship between de facto states and patron states," MPRA Paper 91050, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:91050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/91050/1/MPRA_paper_91050.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pål Kolstø & Helge Blakkisrud, 2008. "Living with Non-recognition: State- and Nation-building in South Caucasian Quasi-states," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(3), pages 483-509.
    2. Pål Kolstø, 2006. "The Sustainability and Future of Unrecognized Quasi-States," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 43(6), pages 723-740, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eleanor Knott, 2015. "What Does it Mean to Be a Kin Majority? Analyzing Romanian Identity in Moldova and Russian Identity in Crimea from Below," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 96(3), pages 830-859, September.
    2. Zsuzsa Csergő & Philippe Roseberry & Stefan Wolff, 2017. "Institutional Outcomes of Territorial Contestation: Lessons from Post-Communist Europe, 1989–2012," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 47(4), pages 491-521.
    3. Sebastian RELITZ, 2016. "De Facto States In The European Neighbourhood: Between Russian Domination And European (Dis)Engagement. The Case Of Abkhazia," EURINT, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 3, pages 96-113.
    4. Michal Smetana & Jan Ludvík, 2019. "Between war and peace: a dynamic reconceptualization of “frozen conflicts”," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Magdalena Dembińska & Frédéric Mérand, 2019. "The role of international brokers in frozen conflicts: the case of transnistria," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 15-30, March.
    6. Masayuki Kudamatsu, 2019. "Observing Economic Growth in Unrecognized States with Nighttime Light," OSIPP Discussion Paper 19E002, Osaka School of International Public Policy, Osaka University.
    7. Kopeček Vincenc & Hoch Tomáš & Baar Vladimír, 2016. "De Facto States and Democracy: The Case of Abkhazia," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 32(32), pages 85-104, June.
    8. Sutherland, Ewan, 2013. "Independence and the regulatory state—Telecommunications in Scotland and the rest of the United Kingdom," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 1046-1059.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    De Facto States; Patron States; Recognition; International Society;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A1 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics
    • K00 - Law and Economics - - General - - - General (including Data Sources and Description)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:91050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.