IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Kontroverzia internetovej stratégie
[Internet Strategy Controversy]

Listed author(s):
  • Zagorsek, Branislav

There are two basic views of the internet strategy. The traditional one says that the internet is just a new technology a powerful tool but nothing else. There is no reason to rethink the rules of entrepreneurship and strategy. As the technology is new the optimal approaches did not already settle down so it is not clear yet what is the proper one. The other view sees the internet as begin of new era. The need of new rules emerges because the old are not sufficient enough to lead the company to success. The reason is turbulent environment with plenty of data to analyze and opportunities to use. This paper is offering some ideas and views of how to handle this situation. The idea is to combine both approaches until the proper theory is created. The solution is to manoeuvre between both approaches and to incline to the one that meets the needs of the specific environment.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: original version
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 51935.

in new window

Date of creation: 29 Sep 2011
Publication status: Published in Ekonomika, financie a manažment podniku 2011 (2011): pp. 1-6
Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:51935
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany

Phone: +49-(0)89-2180-2459
Fax: +49-(0)89-2180-992459
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:51935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joachim Winter)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.