IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/50167.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

U.S. Foreign Policy and Asia: Peace and Prosperity or Instability and Crisis?

Author

Listed:
  • Khan, Haider

Abstract

Should the U.S. reassess its grand strategy and as part of this reassessment change its policy perspective strategically in Asia? These are difficult and contentious questions. However, given the current turbulence in global politics and political economy, their importance is undeniable. I argue that the US should change its grand strategy, giving up hegemonic practices and working multilaterally with other nations---particularly the BRICS in order to achieve the twin related goals of global peace and economic prosperity. U.S. policy towards Asia is much more than mere regional policy. As the largest continent on our planet, to a large extent Asia holds the key towards the global future for better or worse. U.S. relations with Asia are, therefore, crucial for any reasonable assessment of various pathways to the global future. It is my hope that wise reciprocal (or even wise unilateral U.S.) policies will open the door towards a better planetary future. Part of this changed strategy will be to build the institutions for a hybrid global financial architecture where regional financial architectures play a crucial role for averting financial and economic crises. To this end cooperating with East Asia in particular is of great strategic significance.

Suggested Citation

  • Khan, Haider, 2013. "U.S. Foreign Policy and Asia: Peace and Prosperity or Instability and Crisis?," MPRA Paper 50167, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:50167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/50167/1/MPRA_paper_50167.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Grand Strategy; East Asia; Turbulence; hybrid global financial architecture; regional financial architecture;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F3 - International Economics - - International Finance
    • F6 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:50167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.