IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Dispute between bank and customer in Bai Bithaman Ajil (BBA). Case in Malaysia

Listed author(s):
  • Nurrachmi, Rininta
  • Mohamed, Hamida
  • Nazah, Nawalin
Registered author(s):

    This paper discusses the issue and dispute in Bai Bithaman Ajil (BBA) which ended in court cases. It attempts to define the issues and dispute that rise in the practice of BBA and the practical case of BBA in the context of Malaysia and Shariah perspective in regards to BBA practices. Critical analysis from the existence literature is employed to answer the objective of the paper. It shows that the dispute happened due the customer has less understanding regarding the contract in BBA. The court cases that occurred between the bank and the customer were always won by the bank because the bank has more legality and the judge won the bank in order to maintain the good image of Islamic bank in the eye of public.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 43991.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 28 Jan 2013
    Date of revision: 14 Dec 2012
    Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:43991
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Ludwigstra├če 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany

    Phone: +49-(0)89-2180-2459
    Fax: +49-(0)89-2180-992459
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:43991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joachim Winter)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.