IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/128668.html

Does Public Financial Management Quality Improve Governance? Evidence from PEFA Assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Tamazian, Artur
  • Vatyan, Arman
  • Farooq, Khuram
  • Melikyan, Davit

Abstract

This paper investigates the specific institutional mechanisms within Public Financial Management (PFM) that drive improvements in governance outcomes, a critical determinant of long-run economic development. Leveraging a comprehensive dataset of 185 national PEFA assessments across 103 countries, we demonstrate that governance enhancements are most robustly associated with the integrity of the execution-stage control-audit chain within PFM systems. Specifically, our disaggregated analysis reveals that internal expenditure controls (PI-20), internal audit (PI-21), and external audit with legislative follow-up (PI-26) operate as an integrated accountability mechanism, significantly influencing Control of Corruption, Government Effectiveness, and Rule of Law across all six Worldwide Governance Indicators. Furthermore, we uncover significant regional heterogeneity, with the PFM-governance association being substantially larger and more statistically significant in Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America and the Caribbean, suggesting that this execution-stage accountability acts as a binding constraint in weaker institutional environments. Our work extends the empirical understanding of the PFM-governance nexus by identifying precise institutional practices and proposing the control-audit chain as a core theoretical mechanism, offering crucial policy implications for targeted PFM reforms in developing economies. These findings, robust to both panel fixed-effects and cross-sectional specifications, underscore the critical role of monitoring and enforcement in policing principal-agent relationships within the public sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamazian, Artur & Vatyan, Arman & Farooq, Khuram & Melikyan, Davit, 2026. "Does Public Financial Management Quality Improve Governance? Evidence from PEFA Assessments," MPRA Paper 128668, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:128668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/128668/1/MPRA_paper_128668.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giuseppe Grossi & David C. Hay & Chamara Kuruppu & Daniel Neely, 2023. "Changing the boundaries of public sector auditing," Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(4), pages 417-430, July.
    2. Steve Loris Gui-Diby, 2022. "Public Financial Management and Fiscal Performance: Evidence from Panel Data Analyses," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(19), pages 1784-1790, November.
    3. repec:wbk:wbpubs:32526 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lawson, Andrew & Harris, Jamelia, 2023. "Is the problem driven iterative adaptation approach (PDIA) a panacea for public financial management reform? Evidence from six African countries," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    2. Yingzheng Yan & Liupeng Chen & Aoqi Xu & Yuanzhu Wei, 2026. "Government Audits and Rural Revitalization: Causal Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 16(1), pages 21582440251, February.
    3. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:10:p:2865-2875 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:wbk:wbpubs:42239 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Muthyaah Mohd Jamil & Siti Nur Balqis Kassim. & Nur Anis Syuhadah Mohamad Radzi. & Nur Kamilia Zuraini. & Sofia Adlina Roslan., 2024. "The Internal Auditors in Catalyst for Sustainability Performance through Environmental Audit," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(7), pages 1141-1147, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • H61 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Budget; Budget Systems
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration
    • O17 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Formal and Informal Sectors; Shadow Economy; Institutional Arrangements
    • O43 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Institutions and Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:128668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.