IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/126718.html

Dynamic Spatial Treatment Effect Boundaries: A Continuous Functional Framework from Navier-Stokes

Author

Listed:
  • Kikuchi, Tatsuru

Abstract

I develop a comprehensive theoretical framework for dynamic spatial treatment effect boundaries using continuous functional definitions grounded in Navier-Stokes partial differential equations. Rather than discrete treatment effect estimators, the framework characterizes treatment intensity as a continuous function $\tau(\mathbf{x}, t)$ over space-time, enabling rigorous analysis of propagation dynamics, boundary evolution, and cumulative exposure patterns. Building on exact self-similar solutions expressible through Kummer confluent hypergeometric and modified Bessel functions, I establish that treatment effects follow scaling laws $\tau(d, t) = t^{-\alpha} f(d/t^\beta)$ where exponents characterize diffusion mechanisms. The continuous functional approach yields natural definitions of spatial boundaries $d^*(t)$, boundary velocities $v(t) = \partial d^*/\partial t$, treatment effect gradients $\nabla_d \tau$, and integrated exposure functionals $\int_0^T \tau \, dt$. Empirical validation using 42 million TROPOMI satellite observations of NO$_2$ pollution from U.S. coal-fired power plants demonstrates strong exponential spatial decay ($\kappa_s = 0.004028$ per km, $R^2 = 0.35$) with detectable boundaries at $d^* = 572$ km from major facilities. Monte Carlo simulations confirm superior performance over discrete parametric methods in boundary detection and false positive avoidance (94\% correct rejection rate versus 27\% for parametric methods). The framework successfully diagnoses regional heterogeneity: positive decay parameters within 100 km of coal plants validate the theory, while negative decay parameters beyond 100 km correctly signal when alternative pollution sources dominate. This sign reversal demonstrates the framework's diagnostic capability---it identifies when underlying physical assumptions hold versus when alternative mechanisms dominate. Applications span environmental economics (pollution dispersion fields), banking (spatial credit access functions), and healthcare (hospital accessibility). The continuous functional perspective unifies spatial econometrics with mathematical physics, connecting to recent advances in spatial correlation robust inference \citet{muller2022spatial} and addressing spurious spatial regression concerns \citet{muller2024spatial}.

Suggested Citation

  • Kikuchi, Tatsuru, 2025. "Dynamic Spatial Treatment Effect Boundaries: A Continuous Functional Framework from Navier-Stokes," MPRA Paper 126718, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:126718
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/126718/1/MPRA_paper_126718.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angrist, Joshua & Kolesár, Michal, 2024. "One instrument to rule them all: The bias and coverage of just-ID IV," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 240(2).
    2. Angus Deaton, 2010. "Understanding the Mechanisms of Economic Development," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 24(3), pages 3-16, Summer.
    3. Ulrich K. Müller & Mark W. Watson, 2024. "Spatial Unit Roots and Spurious Regression," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 92(5), pages 1661-1695, September.
    4. Kyle Butts, 2021. "Difference-in-Differences Estimation with Spatial Spillovers," Papers 2105.03737, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    5. repec:pri:rpdevs:deaton_understanding_mechanisms_of_economic_development_with_abstract_apr is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Ulrich K. Müller & Mark W. Watson, 2022. "Spatial Correlation Robust Inference," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(6), pages 2901-2935, November.
    7. Conley, T. G., 1999. "GMM estimation with cross sectional dependence," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 1-45, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tatsuru Kikuchi, 2025. "Dynamic Spatial Treatment Effect Boundaries: A Continuous Functional Framework from Navier-Stokes Equations," Papers 2510.14409, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    2. Tatsuru Kikuchi, 2025. "Dynamic Spatial Treatment Effects as Continuous Functionals: Theory and Evidence from Healthcare Access," Papers 2510.15324, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    3. Tatsuru Kikuchi, 2025. "Spatial and Temporal Boundaries in Difference-in-Differences: A Framework from Navier-Stokes Equation," Papers 2510.11013, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    4. Tatsuru Kikuchi, 2025. "Nonparametric Identification and Estimation of Spatial Treatment Effect Boundaries: Evidence from 42 Million Pollution Observations," Papers 2510.12289, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    5. Tatsuru Kikuchi, 2025. "Emergent Dynamical Spatial Boundaries in Emergency Medical Services: A Navier-Stokes Framework from First Principles," Papers 2510.26810, arXiv.org.
    6. Kikuchi, Tatsuru, 2025. "Dynamic Spatial Treatment Effects as Continuous Functionals: Theory and Evidence from Healthcare Access," MPRA Paper 126727, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Becker, Sascha O & Boll, P. David & Voth, Hans-Joachim, 2025. "Spatial Unit Roots in Regressions : A Practitioner’s Guide and a Stata Package," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1541, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    8. Tatsuru Kikuchi, 2025. "Treatment Effects with Correlated Spillovers: Bridging Discrete and Continuous Methods," Papers 2512.12653, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2025.
    9. Stefano DellaVigna & Guido Imbens & Woojin Kim & David M. Ritzwoller, 2025. "Using Multiple Outcomes to Adjust Standard Errors for Spatial Correlation," NBER Working Papers 33716, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Miguel Fajardo-Steinhauser, 2023. "Peace Dividends: The Economic Effects of Colombia's Peace Agreement," Papers 2301.01843, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    11. Bruno Ferman, 2023. "Inference in difference‐in‐differences: How much should we trust in independent clusters?," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(3), pages 358-369, April.
    12. Fenske, James & Gupta, Bishnupriya & Mukhopadhyay, Anwesh, 2025. "Colonial Persistence," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1557, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    13. Sascha O. Becker & Amma Panin & Steven J. Pfaff & Jared Rubin, 2025. "Religion and Economic Development: Past, Present, and Future," Working Papers 25-01, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
    14. Conley, Timothy G. & Kelly, Morgan, 2025. "The standard errors of persistence," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    15. Jorge A. Arroyo, 2025. "Big Wins, Small Net Gains: Direct and Spillover Effects of First Industry Entries in Puerto Rico," Papers 2511.19469, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
    16. Joseph, Iverson-Love, 2022. "The effect of natural disaster on economic growth: Evidence from a major earthquake in Haiti," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    17. Marein, Brian, 2023. "Public health departments and the mortality transition in Latin America: Evidence from Puerto Rico," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    18. Paul Berbée & Sebastian Till Braun & Richard Franke, 2025. "Reversing fortunes of German regions, 1926–2019: Boon and bane of early industrialization?," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 307-337, June.
    19. Alfred Garloff & Carsten Pohl & Norbert Schanne, 2013. "Do small labor market entry cohorts reduce unemployment?," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 29(15), pages 379-406.
    20. Adrian Nicholas Gachet, 2022. "Help Me Help You? Populism and Distributive Politics in Ecuador," Economics Discussion Paper Series 2205, Economics, The University of Manchester.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models
    • C31 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models; Quantile Regressions; Social Interaction Models
    • C65 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Miscellaneous Mathematical Tools
    • D04 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Policy: Formulation; Implementation; Evaluation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:126718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.