IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/phd/rpseri/rps_2006-03.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Philippine Hybrid Rice Program: A Case for Redesign and Scaling Down

Author

Listed:
  • David, Cristina C.

Abstract

Promotion of hybrid rice has been the central goal of the government's rice production program since 2001. Yet, farmers' adoption rate has remained low despite concerted efforts and massive subsidies. The highly subsidized approach of the program has been not just ineffective but costly in terms of wasting scarce budgetary resources, compromising the government's regulatory functions, promoting corruption, and distorting farmers' choice of varieties. The government should remove the present system of subsidies on hybrid seeds and related agricultural inputs which are all private goods in nature.

Suggested Citation

  • David, Cristina C., 2007. "The Philippine Hybrid Rice Program: A Case for Redesign and Scaling Down," Research Paper Series RPS 2006-03, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:phd:rpseri:rps_2006-03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.pids.gov.ph/publication/research-paper-series/the-philippine-hybrid-rice-program-a-case-for-redesign-and-scaling-down
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Duygu Akkaya & Kostas Bimpikis & Hau Lee, 2021. "Government Interventions to Promote Agricultural Innovation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 437-452, March.
    2. T. Sathiya Priya & N. Vivek, 2016. "Restructuring the agricultural supply chain," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 135-148.
    3. Isabel López Noriega & Michael Halewood & Gea Galluzzi & Ronnie Vernooy & Enrico Bertacchini & Devendra Gauchan & Eric Welch, 2013. "How Policies Affect the Use of Plant Genetic Resources: The Experience of the CGIAR," Resources, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-39, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:phd:rpseri:rps_2006-03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aniceto Orbeta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pidgvph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.