IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Who Has Most Say in Cooking?

Listed author(s):
  • Raghav Gaiha
  • Raghbendra Jha


  • Vani S. Kulkarni,

The present analysis seeks to build on household economics literature by focusing on who in fact has most say in cooking-the female spouse, the husband or a senior female member/ the mother-in-law-and how this role is shaped by a diversity of factors (e.g. caste, type of family, demographic characteristics, educational attainments, affluence, and location). A complex but not implausible pattern is revealed in which all these variables matter in varying degrees. To the extent that caste, type of family, number of male and female adults in paid employment, their educational attainments, and lifestyle differences matter, the familiar story of a more decisive role of women in paid employment in influencing household allocation of resources for food, health and education needs reexamination. More importantly, if the patterns of decision-making revealed by our analysis are associated with more varied nutritional and other health related outcomes, the policies designed to influence the latter are far from obviousespecially in light of the important roles of cultural values and evolving life style patterns.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by The Australian National University, Australia South Asia Research Centre in its series ASARC Working Papers with number 2009-19.

in new window

Length: 21
Date of creation: 2009
Handle: RePEc:pas:asarcc:2009-19
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Crawford Building, Lennox Crossing, Building #132, Canberra ACT 2601

Phone: +61 2 6125 4705
Fax: +61 2 6125 5448
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pas:asarcc:2009-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Raghbendra Jha)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.