IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osp/wpaper/26j011.html

É ¸Å®Šç™‚ɤŠè²»Å°Žå…¥Ã «Ã‚ˆã‚‹Å¾Œç™ºåœ»È–¬Å“ Ľ¿Ç”¨Ã ¸Ã ®Å½±Éÿ¿Ï¼Šåœ»Ç§‘Å…¥É™¢Ã‚’Ư”ȼƑåÿºæº–à ¨Ã ™Ã‚‹Ä¾›Çµ¦Çµœè·¯Åˆ¥Åˆ†Æž

Author

Listed:
  • Takumi Gotoh

    (Osaka School of International Public Policy, the University of Osaka)

Abstract

Price policies to promote generic drug use may have different effects across supply pathways. Previous studies show that patient and physician preferences, inertia in past choices, and pharmacy explanations about generic substitution affect switching, but little is known about how a common change in patient cost sharing affects outpatient medical care, dental care, and pharmacy dispensing differently. This study uses the selected medical treatment charge for long-listed originator drugs, introduced nationwide in Japan in October 2024, as a cost-sharing shock. Using monthly aggregate data from the Japan Health Insurance Association, disaggregated by prefecture, age group, therapeutic class, and other characteristics, I estimate difference-in-differences models of generic drug volume shares. Relative to medical inpatient care, which was not directly covered by the policy, generic shares rose by 2.3 percentage points in outpatient medical care, 2.5 points in dental care, and 1.9 points in pharmacy dispensing. The outpatient and dental estimates do not differ significantly, whereas the pharmacy estimate is significantly smaller. These findings suggest that cost-sharing incentives promote generic substitution, but their effectiveness depends on both the price gap and pathway-specific drug-selection processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Takumi Gotoh, 2026. "É ¸Å®Šç™‚ɤŠè²»Å°Žå…¥Ã «Ã‚ˆã‚‹Å¾Œç™ºåœ»È–¬Å“ Ľ¿Ç”¨Ã ¸Ã ®Å½±Éÿ¿Ï¼Šåœ»Ç§‘Å…¥É™¢Ã‚’Ư”ȼƑåÿºæº–à ¨Ã ™Ã‚‹Ä¾›Çµ¦Çµœè·¯Åˆ¥Åˆ†Æž," OSIPP Discussion Paper 26J011, Osaka School of International Public Policy, Osaka University.
  • Handle: RePEc:osp:wpaper:26j011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.osipp.osaka-u.ac.jp/archives/DP/2026/DP2026J011.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • L65 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Chemicals; Rubber; Drugs; Biotechnology; Plastics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osp:wpaper:26j011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Akiko Murashita (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iposujp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.