IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/mx2u7.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Inventing ‘infrastructure’: tracing the etymological blueprint of an omnipresent sociotechnical metaphor

Author

Listed:
  • Tribillon, Justinien

Abstract

This article proposes an archaeology of the concept of ‘infrastructure’, focusing specifically on a period ranging from 1842 until 1951, before the term entered the English language from French. In doing so, it contributes to an ongoing discussion on ‘What does infrastructure really mean?’ by deconstructing the omnipresent concept of ‘infrastructure’ as an expression of modernity that has crystallised a sociotechnical imaginary: a relation between technology, space and power. Indeed, our understanding of its etymological, epistemological and intellectual origins is patchy, based on repeated chronological mistakes and conceptual misunderstandings. To put it bluntly: we do not know how the word came to be. By unearthing the origins of ‘infrastructure’, this article aims to contribute to scholarly debates on the definition(s) of infrastructure in social sciences, urban studies, science and technology studies and infrastructure studies. It also wishes to contribute to ongoing debates taking place in the public sphere regarding what should count as ‘infrastructure’. This paper’s findings demonstrate a clear relation to Karl Marx’s ‘historical materialism’; the paper also analyses how the word evolved over a short period of time to become sociotechnical metaphor; finally, the paper demonstrates the emergence of a concept that linked engineering to larger socioeconomic concerns in the 1890s, well before the emergence of ‘infrastructure’ as a key concept of development economics in the 1950s.

Suggested Citation

  • Tribillon, Justinien, 2021. "Inventing ‘infrastructure’: tracing the etymological blueprint of an omnipresent sociotechnical metaphor," SocArXiv mx2u7, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:mx2u7
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/mx2u7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/607db9560c818202725160bc/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/mx2u7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antoine Picon, 2018. "Urban Infrastructure, Imagination and Politics: from the Networked Metropolis to the Smart City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 263-275, March.
    2. Anant Maringanti & Indivar Jonnalagadda, 2015. "Rent gap, fluid infrastructure and population excess in a gentrifying neighbourhood," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2-3), pages 365-374, June.
    3. Maria Kaika & Erik Swyngedouw, 2000. "Fetishizing the modern city: the phantasmagoria of urban technological networks," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(1), pages 120-138, March.
    4. Hall, Suzanne M. & King, Julia & Finlay, Robin, 2017. "Migrant infrastructure: transaction economies in Birmingham and Leicester, UK," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 65328, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramesh, Niranjana, 2022. "An experiment with the minor geographies of major cities: infrastructural relations among the fragments," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114952, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Leslie Quitzow & Friederike Rohde, 2022. "Imagining the smart city through smart grids? Urban energy futures between technological experimentation and the imagined low-carbon city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(2), pages 341-359, February.
    3. Heike Hanhörster & Susanne Wessendorf, 2020. "The Role of Arrival Areas for Migrant Integration and Resource Access," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 1-10.
    4. Quitzow, Leslie & Rohde, Friederike, 2022. "Imagining the smart city through smart grids? Urban energy futures between technological experimentation and the imagined low-carbon city," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 59(2), pages 341-359.
    5. Nyamnjoh, Henrietta & Hall, Suzanne & Cirolia, Liza Rose, 2022. "Precarity, permits, and prayers: “working practices” of Congolese asylum-seeking women in Cape Town," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112734, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Sewoong Hwang & Zoonky Lee & Jonghyuk Kim, 2019. "Real-Time Pedestrian Flow Analysis Using Networked Sensors for a Smart Subway System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Certomà, Chiara & Corsini, Filippo & Frey, Marco, 2020. "Hyperconnected, receptive and do-it-yourself city. An investigation into the European “imaginary” of crowdsourcing for urban governance," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    8. Mary Lawhon & Gloria Nsangi Nakyagaba & Timos Karpouzoglou, 2023. "Towards a modest imaginary? Sanitation in Kampala beyond the modern infrastructure ideal," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(1), pages 146-165, January.
    9. John Rennie Short, 2016. "A perfect storm: climate change, the power grid, and regulatory regime change after network failure," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(2), pages 244-261, March.
    10. Lucy Hewitt & Stephen Graham, 2015. "Vertical cities: Representations of urban verticality in 20th-century science fiction literature," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(5), pages 923-937, April.
    11. Douglas Noonan & Shan Zhou & Robert Kirkman, 2017. "Making Smart and Sustainable Infrastructure Projects Viable: Private Choices, Public Support, and Systems Constraints," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(3), pages 18-32.
    12. María José Álvarez Rivadulla & Diana Bocarejo, 2014. "Beautifying the Slum: Cable Car Fetishism in Cazucá, Colombia," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 2025-2041, November.
    13. Franciszek Chwałczyk, 2020. "Around the Anthropocene in Eighty Names—Considering the Urbanocene Proposition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-33, May.
    14. COLIN McFARLANE, 2008. "Governing the Contaminated City: Infrastructure and Sanitation in Colonial and Post‐Colonial Bombay," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 415-435, June.
    15. Indivar Jonnalagadda, 2022. "Of political entrepreneurs: Assembling community and social capital in Hyderabad’s informal settlements," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(4), pages 717-733, March.
    16. Victoria Ruiz Rincón & Joan Martínez-Alier & Sara Mingorria, 2019. "Environmental Conflicts Related to Urban Expansion Involving Agrarian Communities in Central Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-19, November.
    17. Catherine Crawford & Sarah Bell, 2012. "Analysing the Relationship between Urban Livelihoods and Water Infrastructure in Three Settlements in Cusco, Peru," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(5), pages 1045-1064, April.
    18. Hanna Baumann & Haim Yacobi, 2022. "Introduction: Infrastructural stigma and urban vulnerability," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(3), pages 475-489, February.
    19. Ian R. Cook & Erik Swyngedouw, 2012. "Cities, Social Cohesion and the Environment: Towards a Future Research Agenda," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(9), pages 1959-1979, July.
    20. Gareth A S Edwards & Harriet Bulkeley, 2017. "Urban political ecologies of housing and climate change: The ‘Coolest Block’ Contest in Philadelphia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(5), pages 1126-1141, April.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:mx2u7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.