IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/fu8a3.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

International Relations And Global Politics: Germany’s Cultural Diplomacy: A Political-Logical Case Study Of Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung In Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • blessing, elisha
  • eric, charles
  • alexis, serena

Abstract

I. Introduction In the intricate tapestry of international relations and global politics, cultural diplomacy stands out as a powerful tool, weaving connections, bridging gaps, and fostering understanding between nations. Within this framework, Germany has long been a stalwart proponent of cultural diplomacy, recognizing its potential to shape perceptions, influence policy, and facilitate meaningful dialogue on the world stage. At the heart of Germany’s cultural diplomacy efforts lies the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES), an institution whose initiatives in Vietnam serve as a compelling case study. This exploration delves into the intricacies of FES’s endeavors, dissecting the political and logical dimensions that underpin its initiatives in Vietnam. The study of FES’s cultural diplomacy in Vietnam provides a unique lens through which to examine the intersections of politics and logic within the realm of international relations. By narrowing our focus to this specific case, we embark on a nuanced analysis of the deliberate strategies, collaborative partnerships, and socio-political impacts that characterize Germany’s engagement with Vietnam. In understanding the political motivations that drive cultural diplomacy and the logical discourse that accompanies it, we gain valuable insights into the broader landscape of global politics. This study endeavors to unravel the layers of Germany’s cultural diplomacy by probing into the multifaceted approach adopted by FES in Vietnam. As we navigate through the historical context of Germany-Vietnam relations and the conceptual underpinnings of cultural diplomacy, we lay the groundwork for a comprehensive analysis. Through an exploration of FES’s objectives, methods, and the outcomes of its initiatives, we aim to decipher the intricate dynamics at play. From educational programs fostering political awareness to cultural exchanges nurturing logical thinking, each facet of FES’s involvement underscores the symbiotic relationship between politics and logical discourse in diplomacy.

Suggested Citation

  • blessing, elisha & eric, charles & alexis, serena, 2023. "International Relations And Global Politics: Germany’s Cultural Diplomacy: A Political-Logical Case Study Of Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung In Vietnam," OSF Preprints fu8a3, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:fu8a3
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/fu8a3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/652c803a28274505b3b86688/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/fu8a3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anastasios Panopoulos & Athanasios Poulis & Prokopis Theodoridis & Antonios Kalampakas, 2022. "Influencing Green Purchase Intention through Eco Labels and User-Generated Content," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. blessing, elisha & eric, charles & alexis, serena, 2023. "Impact of Germany's Cultural Diplomacy in Vietnam: A Comparative Analysis with Other European Countries," OSF Preprints ma3ej, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:fu8a3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.