IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/ebzsv.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Critical data studies meets discard studies: Waste data reflectivity in digital urban waste tracking system

Author

Listed:
  • Strzelecka, Celina

Abstract

This article examines the implementation and impact of the Digital Urban Waste Tracking System (DUWTS) in Poland, a smart waste management technology designed to enhance waste segregation practices in urban environments. DUWTS combines public administration and private sector efforts to oversee proper waste disposal through advanced dataveillance technologies. The system utilizes electronic ground containers equipped with sensors and QR codes to weigh and record waste, aiming to improve recycling levels and manage waste data. The purpose of the research is to critically explore the concept of "waste data reflectivity," highlighting the socio-technological implications of data representation in waste management. The major findings reveal significant distortions and errors in data reflection, impacting various stakeholders, including municipalities, waste disposal companies, and residents. The study concludes that while DUWTS represents a technological advancement, it also perpetuates existing challenges in waste management by obscuring true complexities and responsibilities. Integrating critical discard studies and critical data studies, the article provides a nuanced understanding of the data-driven waste management systems' complexities and challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Strzelecka, Celina, 2024. "Critical data studies meets discard studies: Waste data reflectivity in digital urban waste tracking system," OSF Preprints ebzsv, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:ebzsv
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/ebzsv
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/670686ff9a1f1e2a8dfcafc2/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/ebzsv?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dorota Walentek, 2021. "Datafication Process in the Concept of Smart Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Simon Joss & Frans Sengers & Daan Schraven & Federico Caprotti & Youri Dayot, 2019. "The Smart City as Global Discourse: Storylines and Critical Junctures across 27 Cities," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 3-34, January.
    3. Klaus Hoeyer, 2020. "Data promiscuity: how the public–private distinction shaped digital data infrastructures and notions of privacy," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:osf:osfxxx:ebzsv_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Paola Panuccio, 2019. "Smart Planning: From City to Territorial System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Kevin Morgan & Brian Webb, 2020. "Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 84-95.
    4. Ani MATEI & Elena Alexandra DOBRE, 2021. "Factori cheie si provocari privind guvernanta inteligenta si rolul autoritatilor publice in dezvoltarea ecosistemelor de inovare urbana in cadrul modelului Cvadruplu Helix," Smart Cities International Conference (SCIC) Proceedings, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 9, pages 259-276, November.
    5. Natalya KOSTKO & Mariya BATYREVA & Irina PECHERKINA & Oksana LAZAREVA, 2021. "Are Smart Technologies An Instrument Of Active City Dwellers?," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(3), pages 73-91, August.
    6. Xiang Feng & Ben Derudder & Liang Dai & Wei Shen & Rui Shao & Peter J. Taylor, 2024. "Comparative analysis of the connectivity of world cities in Europe and Asia through the lens of advanced producer service networks," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 121-144, March.
    7. Tomáš Hubinský & Roman Hajtmanek & Andrea Šeligová & Ján Legény & Robert Špaček, 2023. "Potentials and Limits of Photovoltaic Systems Integration in Historic Urban Structures: The Case Study of Monument Reserve in Bratislava, Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-27, January.
    8. De Jong, Martin & Joss, Simon & Taeihagh, Araz, 2024. "Smart cities as spatial manifestations of 21st century capitalism," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    9. Changju Lee & Sunghoon Lee, 2022. "Exploring the Contributions by Transportation Features to Urban Economy: An Experiment of a Scalable Tree-Boosting Algorithm with Big Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-30, April.
    10. Amankwaa, Godfred & Heeks, Richard & Browne, Alison L., 2024. "Powershifts, organisational value, and water management: Digital transformation of Ghana's public water utility," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    11. Heta Tarkkala & Karoliina Snell, 2022. "‘The window of opportunity is closing’—advocating urgency and unity," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, December.
    12. Nancy Odendaal, 2021. "Everyday urbanisms and the importance of place: Exploring the elements of the emancipatory smart city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(3), pages 639-654, February.
    13. Robyn Dowling & Pauline McGuirk & Sophia Maalsen & Jathan Sadowski, 2021. "How smart cities are made: A priori, ad hoc and post hoc drivers of smart city implementation in Sydney, Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(16), pages 3299-3315, December.
    14. Elizabeth Ujunwa Ekine & Emmanuel C. Uwaezuoke & Emmanuel R. Agumagu, 2023. "Bridging Access for Underserved Populations and Smart Cities Innovations," International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Technology, Prasu Publications, vol. 2(6), pages 19-43.
    15. Mikołaj Biesaga & Anna Domaradzka & Magdalena Roszczyńska-Kurasińska & Szymon Talaga & Andrzej Nowak, 2023. "The effect of the pandemic on European narratives on smart cities and surveillance," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(10), pages 1894-1914, August.
    16. Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko, 2023. "Smart Circular Cities: Governing the Relationality, Spatiality, and Digitality in the Promotion of Circular Economy in an Urban Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-41, August.
    17. Jörg Becker & Friedrich Chasin & Michael Rosemann & Daniel Beverungen & Jennifer Priefer & Jan vom Brocke & Martin Matzner & Adela del Rio Ortega & Manuel Resinas & Flavia Santoro & Minseok Song & Kan, 2023. "City 5.0: Citizen involvement in the design of future cities," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-21, December.
    18. Vahid Javidroozi & Claudia Carter & Michael Grace & Hanifa Shah, 2023. "Smart, Sustainable, Green Cities: A State-of-the-Art Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, March.
    19. Katrin Schade & Marcus Hübscher & Felix zur Lage & Juana Schulze & Johannes Ringel, 2022. "Integrating Retail into an Urban Data Platform from a Stakeholder Perspective: Network Approaches in Leipzig (Germany)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Atiya Bukhari & Safiya Mukhtar Alshibani & Mohamed Abouelhassan Ali, 2024. "Smart City as an Ecosystem to Foster Entrepreneurship and Well-Being: Current State and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-22, December.
    21. Barbara Fura & Aneta Karasek & Beata Hysa, 2025. "Statistical assessment of digital transformation in European Union countries under sustainable development goal 9," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 937-972, February.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:ebzsv. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.