IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/8xg2e_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Administrative Burdens as Barriers to Afforestation: A Sludge Audit of Ireland’s Afforestation Scheme

Author

Listed:
  • Lades, Leonhard
  • Lentz, Patricia
  • Augustenborg, Cara

Abstract

Many governments offer financial incentives to encourage landowners to plant trees. However, administrative burdens associated with these afforestation schemes can hinder grant uptake. This paper builds on existing research on administrative burdens and “sludge,” which addresses these administrative challenges, by conducting a sludge audit of Ireland’s Afforestation Scheme. We create a journey map that outlines the typical steps involved in securing afforestation grants, assess the level and type of sludge at each step in this process, and conduct a thematic qualitative analysis of stakeholder interviews. The audit reveals that unpredictable timelines in the application process serve as a significant barrier to afforestation efforts. Additionally, the high level of uncertainty surrounding grant application outcomes complicates the decision-making process for landowners, making it challenging to determine whether pursuing the scheme is worthwhile. To address these challenges, we recommend streamlining information requirements, establishing clear timelines, and enhancing communication to reduce friction and facilitate afforestation.

Suggested Citation

  • Lades, Leonhard & Lentz, Patricia & Augustenborg, Cara, 2025. "Administrative Burdens as Barriers to Afforestation: A Sludge Audit of Ireland’s Afforestation Scheme," OSF Preprints 8xg2e_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:8xg2e_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/8xg2e_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/67fe30c16bddf38489c1088c/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/8xg2e_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Del Rossi, Gemma & Hecht, Jory S. & Zia, Asim, 2021. "A mixed-methods analysis for improving farmer participation in agri-environmental payments for ecosystem services in Vermont, USA," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew C. LaFevor & Alexandra G. Ponette-González & Rebecca Larson & Leah M. Mungai, 2021. "Spatial Targeting of Agricultural Support Measures: Indicator-Based Assessment of Coverages and Leakages," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Ping Lei & Ram Kumar Shrestha & Bing Zhu & Suju Han & Hongbin Yang & Shaojun Tan & Jiupai Ni & Deti Xie, 2021. "A Bibliometric Analysis on Nonpoint Source Pollution: Current Status, Development, and Future," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Matthew M. Smith & Gary Bentrup & Todd Kellerman & Katherine MacFarland & Richard Straight & Lord Ameyaw, 2022. "Agroforestry Extent in the United States: A Review of National Datasets and Inventory Efforts," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Stefano Bruzzese & Iva Tolić Mandić & Sanja Tišma & Simone Blanc & Filippo Brun & Dijana Vuletić, 2023. "A Framework Proposal for the Ex Post Evaluation of a Solution-Driven PES Scheme: The Case of Medvednica Nature Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Min Song & Yuxin Ji & Mingdi Zhu & Junji Yue & Luping Yi, 2022. "Routes Determine Results? Comparing the Performance of Differentiated Farmland Conservation Policies in China Based on Farmers’ Perceptions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Connor, Jeffery D. & Summers, David & Regan, Courtney & Abbott, Hayley & Van Der Linden, Leon & Frizenschaf, Jacqueline, 2022. "Sensitivity analysis in economic evaluation of payments for water and carbon ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:8xg2e_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.