IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/427tc.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Principles for using evidence to improve biodiversity impact mitigation by business

Author

Listed:
  • White, Thomas
  • Petrovan, Silviu Octavian

    (University of Cambridge)

  • Bennun, Leon
  • Butterworth, Tom
  • Christie, Alec Philip
  • Downey, Harriet
  • Hunter, Sara Bronwen
  • Jobson, Benjamin
  • zu Ermgassen, Sophus Olav Sven Emil
  • Sutherland, William J

Abstract

There is an increasing expectation on the private sector to address biodiversity impacts and contribute towards global conservation goals. Appropriate evidence use can help businesses avoid biodiversity losses and realise gains, reduce resources wasted on ineffective or suboptimal action, whilst minimising biodiversity-related risks and securing opportunities from engaging with biodiversity. We review the status of evidence-based action in the private sector, where previous studies have identified concerning trends, and explore the barriers that may currently be hindering evidence use. To learn from this, and improve evidence use, we propose a set of principles for evidence-based biodiversity impact mitigation. We outline tools and resources that can help businesses move towards evidence-based practice and achieve each of these principles. Meeting these principles would improve the biodiversity outcomes from business’ biodiversity related actions. However, for business action to contribute more fully to global conservation goals, broader political and socio-economic issues also need addressing.

Suggested Citation

  • White, Thomas & Petrovan, Silviu Octavian & Bennun, Leon & Butterworth, Tom & Christie, Alec Philip & Downey, Harriet & Hunter, Sara Bronwen & Jobson, Benjamin & zu Ermgassen, Sophus Olav Sven Emil & , 2022. "Principles for using evidence to improve biodiversity impact mitigation by business," OSF Preprints 427tc, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:427tc
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/427tc
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/62d6ce30f66a943af023062b/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/427tc?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thompson, Benjamin S., 2018. "The political ecology of mangrove forest restoration in Thailand: Institutional arrangements and power dynamics," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 503-514.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richards, Daniel Rex & Lavorel, Sandra, 2022. "Integrating social media data and machine learning to analyse scenarios of landscape appreciation," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    2. Benjamin S. Thompson, 2019. "Payments for ecosystem services and corporate social responsibility: Perspectives on sustainable production, stakeholder relations, and philanthropy in Thailand," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 497-511, May.
    3. Harada, Kazuhiro & Habib, Muhammad & Sakata, Yumi & Maryudi, Ahmad, 2022. "The role of NGOs in recognition and sustainable maintenance of customary forests within indigenous communities: The case of Kerinci, Indonesia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    4. Alison A. Ormbsby & Jeff Felardo & Robert Musci, 2021. "Multiple values from the forest: contribution of non-timber forest products to livelihoods of local communities in Northeastern Thailand," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 11636-11645, August.
    5. Jean-Baptiste Bahers & Paula Higuera & Anne Ventura & Nicolas Antheaume, 2020. "The “Metal-Energy-Construction Mineral” Nexus in the Island Metabolism: The Case of the Extractive Economy of New Caledonia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
    6. T. B. White & S. O. Petrovan & L. A. Bennun & T. Butterworth & A. P. Christie & H. Downey & S. B. Hunter & B. R. Jobson & S. O. S. E. zu Ermgassen & W. J. Sutherland, 2023. "Principles for using evidence to improve biodiversity impact mitigation by business," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4719-4733, November.
    7. Obsatar Sinaga & Abdul Rahman Hi & Suharno Pawirosumarto, 2025. "Environmental Policy Implementation and Communication in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations Manufacturing: A Comparative Case Study of Three Key Manufacturing Firms in Indonesia, Malaysia, and," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-19, April.
    8. Sindhu Sreeranga & Hiroshi Takagi & Rikuo Shirai, 2021. "Community-Based Portable Reefs to Promote Mangrove Vegetation Growth: Bridging between Ecological and Engineering Principles," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Céline Huber & Luc Doyen & Sylvie Ferrari, 2021. "Profitability and conservation goals reconciled through biodiversity offsets," Bordeaux Economics Working Papers 2021-19, Bordeaux School of Economics (BSE).
    10. Tiptiwa Sampantamit & Long Ho & Carl Lachat & Nantida Sutummawong & Patrick Sorgeloos & Peter Goethals, 2020. "Aquaculture Production and Its Environmental Sustainability in Thailand: Challenges and Potential Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, March.
    11. Jean-Baptiste Bahers & Paula Higuera & Anne Ventura & Nicolas Antheaume, 2020. "The “Metal-Energy-Construction Mineral” Nexus in the Island Metabolism: The Case of the Extractive Economy of New Caledonia," Post-Print hal-02507504, HAL.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:427tc. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.