IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/metaar/qs5gm.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Reply to Breznau, Rinke, and Wuttke on the Discordant Outcomes of Hypothesis Testing

Author

Listed:
  • Goldman, Daniel S

Abstract

Breznau, Rinke, and Wuttke, et al. attempted to test for uniformity in the way hypotheses were tested across multiple research groups. They appeared to find a great deal of discord between conclusions reached using the same hypothesis and data. Yet, what they really found is that scientists are not properly understanding what hypotheses are.

Suggested Citation

  • Goldman, Daniel S, 2021. "A Reply to Breznau, Rinke, and Wuttke on the Discordant Outcomes of Hypothesis Testing," MetaArXiv qs5gm, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:metaar:qs5gm
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/qs5gm
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/616826acfd5b23026898a0b8/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/qs5gm?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goldman, Daniel S, 2018. "The Basics of Hypothesis Tests and Their Interpretations," OSF Preprints u2csn, Center for Open Science.
    2. Breznau, Nate & Rinke, Eike Mark & Wuttke, Alexander & Adem, Muna & Adriaans, Jule & Alvarez-Benjumea, Amalia & Andersen, Henrik Kenneth & Auer, Daniel & Azevedo, Flavio & Bahnsen, Oke, 2021. "Observing Many Researchers using the Same Data and Hypothesis Reveals a Hidden Universe of Data Analysis," MetaArXiv cd5j9, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruohuang Jiao & Wojtek Przepiorka & Vincent Buskens, 2022. "Moderators of reputation effects in peer-to-peer online markets: a meta-analytic model selection approach," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1041-1067, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:metaar:qs5gm. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.