IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/metaar/3ks6r.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Consensus meetings will outperform integrative experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Primbs, Maximilian
  • dudda, leonie
  • Andresen, Pia K.

    (Utrecht University)

  • Buchanan, Erin Michelle

    (Harrisburg University of Science and Technology)

  • Peetz, Hannah Katharina
  • Silan, Miguel Alejandro A.
  • Lakens, Daniel

    (Eindhoven University of Technology)

Abstract

We expect that consensus meetings, where researchers come together to discuss their theoretical viewpoints, prioritize the factors they agree are important to study, standardize their measures, and determine a smallest effect size of interest, will prove to be a more efficient solution to the lack of coordination and integration of claims in science than integrative experiments.

Suggested Citation

  • Primbs, Maximilian & dudda, leonie & Andresen, Pia K. & Buchanan, Erin Michelle & Peetz, Hannah Katharina & Silan, Miguel Alejandro A. & Lakens, Daniel, 2023. "Consensus meetings will outperform integrative experiments," MetaArXiv 3ks6r, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:metaar:3ks6r
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/3ks6r
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/642441595eb882023db72631/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/3ks6r?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:metaar:3ks6r. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.