IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/stiaab/312-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Tools for trustworthy AI: A framework to compare implementation tools for trustworthy AI systems

Author

Listed:
  • OECD

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) advances across economies and societies, stakeholder communities are actively exploring how best to encourage the design, development, deployment and use of AI that is human-centred and trustworthy. This report presents a framework for comparing tools and practices to implement trustworthy AI systems as set out in the OECD AI Principles. The framework aims to help collect, structure and share information, knowledge and lessons learned to date on tools, practices and approaches for implementing trustworthy AI. As such, it provides a way to compare tools in different use contexts. The framework will serve as the basis for the development of an interactive, publicly available database on the OECD.AI Policy Observatory. This report informs ongoing OECD work towards helping policy makers and other stakeholders implement the OECD AI Principles in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Oecd, 2021. "Tools for trustworthy AI: A framework to compare implementation tools for trustworthy AI systems," OECD Digital Economy Papers 312, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:stiaab:312-en
    DOI: 10.1787/008232ec-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/008232ec-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/008232ec-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Diane A. Isabelle & Mika Westerlund, 2022. "A Review and Categorization of Artificial Intelligence-Based Opportunities in Wildlife, Ocean and Land Conservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:stiaab:312-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/scoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.