IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/itfaab/2017-01-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Economics of Enhancing Accessibility: Estimating the Benefits and Costs of Participation

Author

Listed:
  • Bridget R.D. Burdett

    (TDG Ltd.)

  • Stuart M. Locke

    (University of Waikato)

  • Frank Scrimgeour

    (University of Waikato)

Abstract

Inclusiveness affects the underlying thinking and consequential analysis of accessibility issues in transport. If the fundamental premise is that all people are equal and should be viewed as stakeholders in matters of public policy then it not only reflects international treaties, such as the Rights of the Child and the Rights of Persons with Disability, it encapsulates these and others in a broader perspective of equality. To claim that inclusiveness in transport policy is a paradigm shift may be an over statement, however, what seems self-evident in our discussion is not reflected in best practice at this time. It is important that some measure of the particular beneficiaries of investment in barrier-free transport is defined. We propose that the use of observable mobility aids, by persons making all manner of trips as pedestrians and public transport users, can be incorporated into cost-benefit appraisal and to inform broader transport planning. The proportion of people using a mobility aid in catchment populations can be estimated so that gaps can be defined between current and desired levels of demonstrated inclusion in transport and especially accessible infrastructure. This indicator is readily operational to estimate benefits and comparative costs of trips not made. These methods ought to be refined to objectively assess accessibility in parallel with other objectives for transport.

Suggested Citation

  • Bridget R.D. Burdett & Stuart M. Locke & Frank Scrimgeour, 2017. "The Economics of Enhancing Accessibility: Estimating the Benefits and Costs of Participation," International Transport Forum Discussion Papers 2017/01, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:itfaab:2017/01-en
    DOI: 10.1787/84eb3253-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/84eb3253-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/84eb3253-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:itfaab:2017/01-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.