IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/govaah/20-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Regulatory policy 2.0: Viewpoints and beliefs about better regulation: A report from the “Q exercise”

Author

Listed:
  • Claudio M. Radaelli

    (European University Institute)

  • Lorenzo Allio

    (allio-rodrigo consulting)

  • Karl O’Connor

    (Ulster University)

  • Richard Alcorn

    (OECD)

  • Daniel Trnka

    (OECD)

Abstract

Regulatory policy today is still grounded in principles and tools designed a few decades ago, but the context has changed significantly. To determine whether the current framework can help countries meet the challenges of contemporary societies, the OECD launched the Regulatory Policy 2.0 project. This report sets out the results from the second phase of the project, which included an exercise to map beliefs around better regulation. The exercise, involving government officials and regulatory experts, has identified four internally coherent belief systems about what better regulation is today, which core aims it should have, and where it should go in the future. Based on this analysis, the report provides empirical evidence and implications for the future direction of regulatory policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudio M. Radaelli & Lorenzo Allio & Karl O’Connor & Richard Alcorn & Daniel Trnka, 2022. "Regulatory policy 2.0: Viewpoints and beliefs about better regulation: A report from the “Q exercise”," OECD Regulatory Policy Working Papers 20, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:govaah:20-en
    DOI: 10.1787/ab640ae8-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/ab640ae8-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/ab640ae8-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Better Regulation; Regulatory Policy 2.0;

    JEL classification:

    • A1 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics
    • D6 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics
    • D7 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making
    • H00 - Public Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z18 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Public Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:govaah:20-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/teoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.