IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/govaaa/87-en.html

Unleashing the policy potential of rigorous impact evaluation and randomised trials

Author

Listed:
  • Stephane Jacobzone
  • Silvia Picalarga
  • Laurence Dynes
  • Eleanor Williams
  • Harry Greenwell
  • Peter Bowers

Abstract

Rigorous impact evaluations, particularly randomised trials, can provide governments with valuable insights into whether policies and programmes achieve their intended outcomes. Employed effectively, they offer an evidence base that goes beyond assumptions and precedent, supporting better resource allocation and more effective services for citizens. However, despite their potential, such evaluations remain underused in many contexts, given a number of technical and political barriers. This report explores how governments can overcome these barriers and deliver high-quality evaluations to contribute to policy development. It briefly discusses the potential for artificial intelligence to contribute to impact evaluation. It sets out the main evaluation methods available, ranging from randomised trials to quasi-experimental approaches, and highlights the conditions under which each can be applied. It addresses ethical issues and highlights how such concerns can be addressed through careful design and stakeholder engagement. There are also options for ensuring that evaluations can remain cost-effective, including through greater use of administrative data, alignment with policy priorities, and partnerships with wider networks. In particular, it underlines the value of international co-operation and peer learning to build capacity, share methods, and upscale effective programmes.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephane Jacobzone & Silvia Picalarga & Laurence Dynes & Eleanor Williams & Harry Greenwell & Peter Bowers, 2025. "Unleashing the policy potential of rigorous impact evaluation and randomised trials," OECD Working Papers on Public Governance 87, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:govaaa:87-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • A1 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics
    • B49 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Other
    • C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection
    • C9 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments
    • H53 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs
    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:govaaa:87-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/teoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.