IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/envaab/2017-02-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Information needs for the 2018 facilitative dialogue: Issues and options

Author

Listed:
  • Jane Ellis

    (OECD)

  • Manasvini Vaidyula

    (OECD)

Abstract

Decision 1/CP.21 adopting the Paris Agreement established a mandate for a facilitative dialogue to be convened among Parties in 2018. This mandate established two main objectives of the 2018 facilitative dialogue (FD2018): to take stock of collective progress made towards long-term climate goals and to inform preparation of nationally determined contributions. Proposal(s) from the COP22 and COP23 presidencies on how the dialogue should be conducted are expected to be made by COP23. This paper “unpacks” the two main objectives of the FD2018 into distinct components, and examines the implications of addressing different components on the information needs of the FD2018. The paper also examines different types of information that could be required for FD2018 and their availability. Finally, the paper looks at other collective review or stocktake processes that have been carried out under the U.N. to identify relevant lessons for the FD2018, particularly regarding inputs and associated outputs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jane Ellis & Manasvini Vaidyula, 2017. "Information needs for the 2018 facilitative dialogue: Issues and options," OECD/IEA Climate Change Expert Group Papers 2017/02, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:envaab:2017/02-en
    DOI: 10.1787/6b8ffada-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/6b8ffada-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/6b8ffada-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abdelhak Bassou & Badr Mandri & Bouchra Rahmouni & El Mostafa Rezrazi & Eric Ntumba & Fatima Ezzahra Mengoub & Hafsat Abiola & Mbuih Zukane & Mohamed Benaïssa & Mohammed Loulichki & Otaviano Canuto & , 2018. "ATLANTIC CURRENTS : An Annual Report on Wider Atlantic Perspectives and Patterns - Overcoming the Choke Points," Books & Reports, Policy Center for the New South, number 22, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    2018 facilitative dialogue; climate; information needs; UNFCCC;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F53 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Agreements and Observance; International Organizations
    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:envaab:2017/02-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/enoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.