IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/envaaa/277-en.html

Valuing reduced risk of skin sensitisation: A large-scale multi-country stated preference approach

Author

Listed:
  • Davide Contu
  • Chiara Sotis
  • Giles Atkinson
  • Vincent Chung
  • Damien Dussaux
  • Stavros Georgiou
  • Susana Mourato
  • Irène Hu

Abstract

Exposure to chemicals has been shown to cause skin sensitisation, leading to chronic conditions such as allergic contact dermatitis. Beyond physical symptoms, skin sensitisation can also reduce one’s quality of life, impair productivity and cause psychological distress. Despite its prevalence, information on the value that the public places on avoiding chemical-induced skin sensitisation remains limited. To fill this gap, the present paper details a stated preference survey estimating individuals’ willingness-to-pay to avoid the frequency, severity and visibility of skin flare-ups in nine countries (Canada, Denmark, Japan, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States). It also explores how other socio-economic factors such as age, gender and income affect the valuation of skin sensitisation. This work is part of a series of large-scale studies resulting from the Surveys on Willingness-to-Pay to Avoid Negative Chemicals-Related Health Effects project that intends to establish internationally comparable values for the willingness-to-pay to avoid negative health effects due to exposure to chemicals. The results from this paper are expected to be widely applicable in analyses assessing the value of reduced skin sensitisation in a range of chemical and environmental contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Davide Contu & Chiara Sotis & Giles Atkinson & Vincent Chung & Damien Dussaux & Stavros Georgiou & Susana Mourato & Irène Hu, 2026. "Valuing reduced risk of skin sensitisation: A large-scale multi-country stated preference approach," OECD Environment Working Papers 277, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:envaaa:277-en
    DOI: 10.1787/fc305de9-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/fc305de9-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/fc305de9-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • J17 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Value of Life; Foregone Income
    • K32 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Energy, Environmental, Health, and Safety Law
    • Q51 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Valuation of Environmental Effects
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:envaaa:277-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/enoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.