IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/envaaa/272-en.html

Valuing a reduction in the risk of an underactive thyroid: A large-scale multi-country stated preference approach

Author

Listed:
  • Heini Ahtiainen
  • Richard Dubourg
  • Damien Dussaux
  • Irène Hu
  • Väinö Nurmi
  • Elvia Rufo Jimenez
  • Christoph Rheinberger

Abstract

Underactive thyroid (hypothyroidism) is a relatively common condition resulting from exposure to a range of chemicals including phthalates, bisphenols, amitrole and polyhalogenated compounds. Many of these hazardous substances are regulated or under consideration for regulation to reduce exposure and prevent human health risks. Cost-benefit analyses are commonly used to assess the societal impacts of chemicals regulation. However, data on the health benefits of chemicals regulation – most appropriately measured in terms of willingness-to-pay – are often lacking or incomplete. The Surveys on Willingness to Pay to Avoid Negative Chemicals-Related Health Effects (SWACHE) project intends to fill this gap by establishing internationally comparable values for the willingness-to-pay to avoid negative health effects due to exposure to chemicals. As part of the SWACHE project, this paper provides findings from a stated preference survey estimating individuals’ willingness-to-pay to reduce the risk of underactive thyroid across 12 countries (Austria, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Greece, Japan, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, the United Kingdom and the United States). It represents the first ever stated preference valuation studies assessing reductions in the risk of developing hypothyroidism, filling an important gap in the valuation literature and addressing a need for applied benefits analysis for chemicals regulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Heini Ahtiainen & Richard Dubourg & Damien Dussaux & Irène Hu & Väinö Nurmi & Elvia Rufo Jimenez & Christoph Rheinberger, 2026. "Valuing a reduction in the risk of an underactive thyroid: A large-scale multi-country stated preference approach," OECD Environment Working Papers 272, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:envaaa:272-en
    DOI: 10.1787/4af8f3aa-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/4af8f3aa-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/4af8f3aa-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • J17 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Value of Life; Foregone Income
    • K32 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Energy, Environmental, Health, and Safety Law
    • Q51 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Valuation of Environmental Effects
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:envaaa:272-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/enoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.