IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/elsaad/117-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The effectiveness of social protection for long-term care in old age: Is social protection reducing the risk of poverty associated with care needs?

Author

Listed:
  • Tiago Cravo Oliveira Hashiguchi

    (OECD)

  • Ana Llena-Nozal

    (OECD)

Abstract

As people grow old and their health deteriorates, they are likely to require help with everyday activities that were once second nature; they need what is commonly termed long-term care (LTC). With demand for LTC in old age expected to grow, OECD countries face significant challenges in balancing financial sustainability with the provision of effective social protection against the financial risks associated with developing LTC needs – the cost of care can far exceed median incomes and its duration can be many years. This report provides a novel set of comprehensive and internationally comparable estimates of the adequacy, equity and efficiency of public social protection systems for LTC in old age in OECD countries and EU Member States. Using a set of “typical cases” of LTC need to ensure comparability, including different levels of severity and different ways in which needs can be met, this report shows cross-country and regional variations in the total costs of LTC services, the degree of public coverage, the out-of-pocket costs that care recipients face, and the associated poverty risks. The quantitative results are discussed in the context of how different countries design LTC benefits and schemes, including cost-sharing mechanisms. Finally, to illustrate the policy relevance of the analyses, the distributive effects of actual and hypothetical policy scenarios are simulated, including an international free personal care policy, and possible reforms in Ireland and England.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiago Cravo Oliveira Hashiguchi & Ana Llena-Nozal, 2020. "The effectiveness of social protection for long-term care in old age: Is social protection reducing the risk of poverty associated with care needs?," OECD Health Working Papers 117, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:elsaad:117-en
    DOI: 10.1787/2592f06e-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/2592f06e-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/2592f06e-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rong Peng & Xueqin Deng & Yinghua Xia & Bei Wu, 2022. "Assessing the Sustainability of Long-Term Care Insurance Systems Based on a Policy–Population–Economy Complex System: The Case Study of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Stefania Ilinca & Ricardo Rodrigues & Stefan Fors & Eszter Zólyomi & Janet Jull & Johan Rehnberg & Afshin Vafaei & Susan Phillips, 2022. "Gender differences in access to community-based care: a longitudinal analysis of widowhood and living arrangements," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1339-1350, December.
    3. You-Shyang Chen & Chien-Ku Lin & Jerome Chih-Lung Chou & Su-Fen Chen & Min-Hui Ting, 2022. "Application of Advanced Hybrid Models to Identify the Sustainable Financial Management Clients of Long-Term Care Insurance Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    4. Marianne Tenand & Pieter Bakx & Bram Wouterse, 2021. "The impact of co-payments for nursing home care on use, health, and welfare," CPB Discussion Paper 430, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    5. Marianne Tenand & Arjen Hussem & Pieter Bakx, 2020. "Promoting aging in place through flexible care options: recent developments from the Netherlands [Encourager le maintien à domicile des personnes âgées dépendantes par des modalités alternatives de," Working Papers hal-02985777, HAL.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H53 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs
    • H75 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Government: Health, Education, and Welfare
    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:elsaad:117-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eloecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.