IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Final Report of the Development of an International Adult Learning Module (OECD AL Module): Recommendations on Methods, Concepts and Questions in International Adult Learning Surveys

Listed author(s):
  • Helmut Kuwan

    (Social Research and Consultancy)

  • Ann-Charlotte Larsson

    (Statistics Sweden)

Registered author(s):

    Policy interest in international surveys on Adult Learning (AL) has increased strongly. AL survey data are used as benchmarks for a country‘s educational system. However, results of key indicators like participation in learning activities often vary remarkably between different data sources. Stating that these differences are due to varying concepts and methods is not enough. The key question is: Which figures represent reality more appropriately? Therefore, evaluation of survey concepts and methods is crucial for international comparison of Adult Learning. This report provides guidelines on methodological and conceptual issues. Part one covers methodological aspects while part two deals with concepts, definitions and example questions. Recommendations are based on input from 14 countries... L‘intérêt politique envers les enquêtes portant sur la formation des adultes s‘est fortement accru. Les données issues des études menées sur ce thème sont utilisées comme mesures de la performance des systèmes éducatifs nationaux. Pourtant, les résultats d‘indicateurs clés tels que la participation aux activités de formation varient souvent de façon marquée selon la source des données. Il ne suffit cependant pas d‘invoquer les divers concepts et méthodes employés pour expliquer ces variations. En effet, la question clé est la suivante : quels sont les chiffres qui représentent la réalité de la façon la plus appropriée ? Par conséquent, l‘évaluation des concepts et méthodes d‘enquête s‘avère cruciale pour la comparaison internationale des formations des adultes. Le présent rapport founit des directives sur des questions méthodologiques et conceptuelles. La première partie traite des aspects méthodologiques, tandis que la deuxième partie présente les concepts, définitions et les exemples de questions. Les recommandations formulées reposent sur des données fournies par 14 pays...

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by OECD Publishing in its series OECD Education Working Papers with number 21.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 26 Sep 2008
    Handle: RePEc:oec:eduaab:21-en
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    2 rue Andre Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16

    Phone: 33-(0)-1-45 24 82 00
    Fax: 33-(0)-1-45 24 85 00
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:eduaab:21-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.