IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/ecoaaa/941-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Improving Energy System Efficiency in the Czech Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Artur Radziwill

    (OECD)

Abstract

A carbon intensive energy system in the Czech Republic contributes to one of the highest ratios of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to GDP in the OECD. While EU emission reduction commitments provide the most visible and binding motivation for changing the way in which the country produces and uses energy, action is also required to improve energy security and public health and to avoid an adverse impact of emission reduction on economic growth and living standards. Energy system transformation requires ensuring a comprehensive, consistent and stable policy framework with stronger ex ante and ex post evaluation. A single carbon price should be achieved through the Emission Trading System (ETS) and carbon taxation. Excise tax rates on all fossil energy sources and products should be realigned, based on their carbon content and other environmental externalities, notably by increasing the relative taxation of diesel. Sectoral policies that complement carbon pricing in promoting greener energy sources, energy efficiency and less fuel intensive transport need to be strengthened. Améliorer l'efficacité du système énergétique en République tchèque Le système énergétique de la République tchèque, gros émetteur de carbone, est en partie à l’origine de l’un des plus hauts ratios d’émission de gaz à effet de serre (GES) dans la zone OCDE. Si les engagements pris dans le cadre de l’UE en matière de réduction des émissions sont la raison la plus évidente et impérative de changer les modes de production et de consommation de l’énergie dans le pays, il est également nécessaire d’agir pour améliorer la sécurité énergétique et la santé publique, ainsi que pour éviter que la réduction des émissions n’ait un impact négatif sur la croissance économique et les niveaux de vie. La transformation du système énergétique nécessite un cadre d’action global, cohérent et stable ainsi que des évaluations ex ante et ex post plus solidement étayées. Il faudrait aboutir à un prix unique du carbone au moyen du système communautaire d’échange de quotas d’émission (SCEQE) et de la taxation du carbone. Les taux des droits d’accise sur toutes les sources et tous les produits énergétiques fossiles devraient être réalignés, en fonction de leur teneur en carbone et d’autres externalités environnementales, notamment en relevant le niveau relatif de la taxation du gazole. Les politiques sectorielles qui complètent la tarification du carbone pour agir en faveur des sources d’énergie plus vertes, de l’efficacité énergétique et des transports moins énergivores doivent être renforcées.

Suggested Citation

  • Artur Radziwill, 2012. "Improving Energy System Efficiency in the Czech Republic," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 941, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:941-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k9gsh6mcgzp-en
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angela Cheptea & Lionel Fontagné & Soledad Zignago, 2014. "European export performance," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 150(1), pages 25-58, February.
    2. Enrico Moretti, 2010. "Local Multipliers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(2), pages 373-377, May.
    3. Rebekka Christopoulou & Philip Vermeulen, 2012. "Markups in the Euro area and the US over the period 1981–2004: a comparison of 50 sectors," Empirical Economics, Springer, pages 53-77.
    4. Maurice Obstfeld & Kenneth S. Rogoff, 1996. "Foundations of International Macroeconomics," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262150476, January.
    5. Niels Bosma & Erik Stam & Veronique Schutjens, 2011. "Creative destruction and regional productivity growth: evidence from the Dutch manufacturing and services industries," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 401-418, May.
    6. Jonathan D. Ostry & Carmen M. Reinhart, 1992. "Private Saving and Terms of Trade Shocks: Evidence from Developing Countries," IMF Staff Papers, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 39(3), pages 495-517, September.
    7. Clovis Kerdrain & Isabell Koske & Isabelle Wanner, 2010. "The Impact of Structural Policies on Saving, Investment and Current Accounts," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 815, OECD Publishing.
    8. Calista Cheung & Davide Furceri & Elena Rusticelli, 2013. "Structural and Cyclical Factors behind Current Account Balances," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(5), pages 923-944, November.
    9. Alessandro Rebucci & Nicoletta Batini & Pietro Cova & Massimiliano Pisani, 2009. "Global Imbalances; The Role of Non-Tradabletotal Factor Productivity in Advanced Economies," IMF Working Papers 09/63, International Monetary Fund.
    10. Jens Matthias Arnold & Andreas Worgotter, 2011. "Structural reforms and the benefits of the enlarged EU internal market: still much to be gained," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(13), pages 1231-1235.
    11. Hans-Werner Sinn, 2006. "The Pathological Export Boom and the Bazaar Effect: How to Solve the German Puzzle," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(9), pages 1157-1175, September.
    12. Olivier Blanchard, 2007. "Current Account Deficits in Rich Countries," IMF Staff Papers, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 54(2), pages 191-219, June.
    13. Jean-Marc Fournier & Isabell Koske, 2010. "A Simple Model of the Relationship Between Productivity, Saving and the Current Account," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 816, OECD Publishing.
    14. Suparna Chakraborty & Robert Dekle, 2009. "Can International Productivity Differences Alone Account for the US Current Account Deficits?," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(4), pages 689-715, September.
    15. Dierk Herzer, 2012. "Outward FDI, Total Factor Productivity and Domestic Output: Evidence from Germany," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 155-174, October.
    16. Isabell Koske & Andreas Wörgötter, 2010. "Germany's Growth Potential, Structural Reforms and Global Imbalances," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 780, OECD Publishing.
    17. Naude Wim, 2011. "Global Finance after the Crisis: Reform Imperatives and Vested Interests," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, July.
    18. Robert Dekle & Jonathan Eaton & Samuel Kortum, 2008. "Global Rebalancing with Gravity: Measuring the Burden of Adjustment," IMF Staff Papers, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 55(3), pages 511-540, July.
    19. Felix Hüfner & Isabell Koske, 2010. "Explaining Household Saving Rates in G7 Countries: Implications for Germany," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 754, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    carbon tax; carbon trading systems; Czech Republic; efficacité énergétique; emissions; energy efficiency; infrastructure; infrastructure; marchés des droits d’émission de carbone; République tchèque; taxe carbone; transport; transport; émissions;

    JEL classification:

    • H23 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
    • O44 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Environment and Growth
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:941-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/edoecfr.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.