IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Fixed Cost, Imperfect Competition and Bias in Technology Measurement: Japan and The United States

Listed author(s):
  • Kiyohiko G. Nishimura
  • Masato Shirai
Registered author(s):

    In many industries, competition is far from perfect and managerial efficiency (or a fixed cost) varies among firms. However, traditional measurement of technological progress assumes perfect competition and no fixed cost. This paper incorporates these two factors in the technological-progress measurement and investigates the biases caused by their omission. We show that if capital growth exceeds non-capital-input growth and that firms earn a positive pure profit, then traditional measurement underestimates the true technological progress. We apply this methodology to Japanese and US industries, and find that imperfect competition and managerial efficiency are important. However, the magnitude of the bias is not large ... Dans de nombreuses industries, la concurrence est loin d'être parfaite, et l'efficience du management (ou de charge fixe) varie selon les entreprises. Cependant, les mesures traditionnelles du progrès technologique impliquent une concurrence parfaite et pas de charge fixe. Ce document incorpore ces deux facteurs dans les mesures du progrès technologique et recherche les distortions causées par leurs omissions. On démontre que, si la croissance du capital est supérieure à celle des autres facteurs, et si les entreprises obtiennent un pur profit, les mesures traditionnelles sous-estiment alors les vrais progrès technologiques. On applique cette méthodologie aux industries japonaises et américaines, et on définit l'importance des imperfections à la concurrence et l'efficience du management. Cependant, l'ampleur des distortions n'est pas énorme ...

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by OECD Publishing in its series OECD Economics Department Working Papers with number 273.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 21 Dec 2000
    Handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:273-en
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    2 rue Andre Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16

    Phone: 33-(0)-1-45 24 82 00
    Fax: 33-(0)-1-45 24 85 00
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:273-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.