IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/agraaa/132-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluating the economic benefits and costs of antimicrobial use in food-producing animals

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Ryan

    (OECD)

Abstract

Antimicrobial drugs are used in food animal production for several purposes: to treat a disease outbreak, to prevent disease, and to enhance feed efficiency and animal growth. While the technical benefits of antimicrobial use in animal production are well documented, there is a major lack of information on the economic impact on farmers’ incomes. This report reviews evidence on the economic benefits and costs of antimicrobials for the major animal producing species across several OECD countries as well as in Brazil and China. The findings indicate that the economic benefits are modest in modern farming systems where good production facilities, biosecurity measures, and management practices are in place. In large food animal producing countries such as Brazil, the use of antimicrobials is an important input to enhance the competitiveness of the industry. In China, the largest producer and user of antibiotics in animal production, antibiotics are often used as a substitute for less sanitary animal production facilities and the lack of appropriate biosecurity on the farm. This report concludes with several key policy options and practices, in particular those that induce farmers to place a greater emphasis on the economic benefits and costs of antimicrobials and alternative interventions in production in order to stem the rise in antimicrobial resistance.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Ryan, 2019. "Evaluating the economic benefits and costs of antimicrobial use in food-producing animals," OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers 132, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:agraaa:132-en
    DOI: 10.1787/f859f644-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/f859f644-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/f859f644-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Axelle Poizat & Sabine Duvaleix & Jill Hobbs, 2022. "How does transaction governance in the animal supply chain influence antibiotic use? A study of the French young bull sector," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 1890-1908, December.
    2. Stacy Sneeringer & Gianna Short & Matthew MacLachlan & Maria Bowman, 2020. "Impacts on Livestock Producers and Veterinarians of FDA Policies on Use of Medically Important Antibiotics in Food Animal Production," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(4), pages 674-694, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    antibiotics; farm animals;

    JEL classification:

    • Q1 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:agraaa:132-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tdoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.