IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nsr/niesrd/36.html

Productivity, naachinery and skills in engineering: an Anglo‐Dutch comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Geoff Mason
  • Bart van Ark

Abstract

This paper compares the quality and utilisation of physical and human capital inputs in matched samples of precision engineering plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Detailed comparisons of matched production operations in the two countries suggest that labour productivity levels in the British engineering industry are some 25‐30 per cent lower than in the Netherlands. This productivity gap reflects both slower investment in new capital equipment and lower average levels of workforce skills and knowledge in Britain. The more rapid introduction of new technology in Dutch plants can be attributed in part to the greater support that Dutch managers enjoy from highly‐qualified technical staff. In general, the widespread provision of full‐time vocational education in the Netherlands enables Dutch employers to carry out further training to craft and technician standards more quickly and cost‐effectively than is possible for British employers. The comparisons suggest that British engineering companies are presently devoting more resources to initial and continuing training than their Dutch counterparts, but this is insufficient to offset the initial Dutch advantage. Contact NIESR if copy required

Suggested Citation

  • Geoff Mason & Bart van Ark, 1993. "Productivity, naachinery and skills in engineering: an Anglo‐Dutch comparison," National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) Discussion Papers 36, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:nsr:niesrd:36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nsr:niesrd:36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Library & Information Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/niesruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.