IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nsr/niesrd/178.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Balance of payments prospects in EMU

Author

Listed:
  • Dirk Te Velde

Abstract

The architects of monetary union believed that balance of payments constraints would no longer operate in EMU, but this view underestimates the fact that cross-border financing will still be subject to country credit risk - the risk of widespread debt default by residents of a troubled member state, including the possibilityof secession if serious economic tensions develop at some point. With these concerns in mind the prospects for current account balances of individual EU states are examined through forecasts and simulations using the NiGEM model. In addition special equations are estimated to allocate countries' global current balances between EMU and non-EMU areas, since intra-EMU imbalances are likely to have different financing implications from those with the world outside. The results suggest that whereas most EU states are likely to be in broad external balance or better through the next few years, several seem set to incur substantial current deficits, either with the rest of the area or with the world outside. Particularly at risk are Spain and the UK (whether inside or outside EMU) among the majors and Portugal and Greece among the smaller states. In general these prospects would not be radically affected by mild adverse shocks in the form of a reduction in global demand or a depreciation of the US dollar, assuming they would be unwound by efficient policy action overseas, but if large and protracted shocks were to occur, a number of states could develop deficits on a scale that could hardly be financed smoothly, even in the new regime.

Suggested Citation

  • Dirk Te Velde, 2001. "Balance of payments prospects in EMU," National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) Discussion Papers 178, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:nsr:niesrd:178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nsr:niesrd:178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Library & Information Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/niesruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.