IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Designing and Choosing Macroeconomic Frameworks: The Position of the UK after 4 years of the Euro


  • Dr Martin Weale


  • Ray Barrell



Fiscal and monetary policy framework have become increasingly popular as disenchantment with active stabilisation policy has increased. In order to maximise the gains in terms of welfare and output frameworks need to be designed to achieve targets efficiently and stabilise the volatility of the economy. We evaluate the current fiscal and monetary frameworks in the UK and the Euro Area, and suggest where they can be improved. The UK has notably worse productivity than the Euro Area, and the design of policy frameworks can be utilised to help remove this difference by promoting stability and raising investment. The UK economy went through major regime changes in the 1990s and as a result it has experienced more stable outcomes in the last few years. We evaluate the possible structure of outcomes if the UK remains outside EMU or becomes a member, and conclude that inflation, real interest rates and the level of government borrowing would be similar in both cases. However, it should be the case that further gains to stability and hence to potential productivity are available if the UK becomes a member of EMU. The UK and the Euro Area countries currently have economic cycles that are coherent, experiencing very similar cyclical positions. Although interest rates differ, it is clear that these small differences in rates have little impact on the cyclical position of these economies. In addition we find no evidence that output in the UK is excessively sensitive to changes in interest rates, at least when compared to the other large European countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Dr Martin Weale & Ray Barrell, 2003. "Designing and Choosing Macroeconomic Frameworks: The Position of the UK after 4 years of the Euro," National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) Discussion Papers 212, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:nsr:niesrd:130

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nsr:niesrd:130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Library & Information Manager). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.