IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nsr/escoed/escoe-dp-2018-09.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

UK trade in goods and productivity: New findings

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Wales
  • Russell Black
  • Ted Dolby
  • Gaganan Awano

Abstract

Despite a large international literature on the relationship between firm-level trading behaviour and productivity, evidence on this link for the UK has been hampered by long-standing data issues. This paper addresses this data gap, introducing a new dataset which combines information from the ONS’ Annual Business Survey (ABS) and HM Revenue & Customs’ (HMRC) trade in goods declarations. We apply this new dataset to examine the prevalence of trading behaviour among businesses of different sizes, ownership types and in different industries; and to analyse the link between productivity and trader status for British businesses in the non-financial business economy. The results of this analysis show that large businesses and those which are foreign-owned are most likely to declare international trade in goods. Among businesses with more than 10 employees, only around one-in-five firms report trade in goods to HMRC, but businesses which declare trade in goods accounted for around 40% of all employment in 2016. Most direct trade in goods is undertaken by the Manufacturing and Wholesale & Retail industries. Our analysis also suggests that trade in goods is strikingly concentrated: 38% of the value of UK goods exports was accounted for by the top 50 exporters in 2016, while the top 50 importers accounted for 34% of the value of imports over the same period. Our productivity analysis suggests that the productivity of British businesses which declare international trade in goods was around 70% higher on average than for businesses which did not in 2016. After controlling for their size, industry and foreign ownership status, businesses which declare goods exports or imports have labour productivity premia relative to non-traders of around 21% and 20% respectively. These premia are notably lower for trade with the EU: consistent with lower barriers to EU goods trade enabling relatively less productive businesses to access these markets. Analysis of the link between labour productivity and the intensive margin of trade suggests businesses which source a large proportion of their inputs abroad, which export more products (particularly to non-EU nations), or which export to more countries (particularly within the EU) tend to be more productive than businesses which have less internationalised supply chains, which import a wider variety of products and which have a more limited geographical reach within the EU. Although these results are not necessarily causal, they provide a detailed overview of the link between productivity and trade in goods in the UK context.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip Wales & Russell Black & Ted Dolby & Gaganan Awano, 2018. "UK trade in goods and productivity: New findings," Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE) Discussion Papers ESCoE DP-2018-09, Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE).
  • Handle: RePEc:nsr:escoed:escoe-dp-2018-09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://escoe-website.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/13160018/ESCoE-DP-2018-09.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Saša Petković & Jelica Rastoka & Dragana Radicic, 2023. "Impact of Innovation and Exports on Productivity: Are There Complementary Effects?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Jagjit S. Chadha & Richard Barwell, 2019. "Renewing our Monetary Vows: Open Letters to the Governor of the Bank of England," National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) Occasional Papers 58, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Productivity; trade in goods; administrative data;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F1 - International Economics - - Trade
    • J2 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nsr:escoed:escoe-dp-2018-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ESCoE Centre Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/escoeuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.