IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nse/doctra/g2002-09.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do balances of opinion summarize at the best firms answers to business surveys?

Author

Listed:
  • F. HILD

    (Insee)

Abstract

Business surveys aim at getting, as quickly and as simply as possible, the recent and probable changes in economic activity. Answers to most of the questions are qualitative with three modalities (qualification of an evolution: up / stable / down). The qualitative indicators provided by these surveys are summed up in the form of balances of opinion equal to the difference between the percentage of answers in the upper modality and those in the lower one. However, such indicators do really summarise firms answers only if the percentage of answers to the modality stable are almost constant. The purpose of this paper is to sum up the answers to business surveys in a single indicator which takes into account the percentage of answers to the modality stable. This indicator is constructed from a principal component analysis which gives the linear combination of the three percentages capturing most variability between the sucessive surveys. Very close for some questions, the two summaries of answers appreciably diverge for other questions and can sometimes lead to a different short-term economic analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • F. Hild, 2002. "Do balances of opinion summarize at the best firms answers to business surveys?," Documents de Travail de l'Insee - INSEE Working Papers g2002-09, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques.
    • Handle: RePEc:nse:doctra:g2002-09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bnsp.insee.fr/ark:/12148/bc6p06zqqgm/f1.pdf
    File Function: Document de travail de la DESE numéro G2002-09
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Business surveys; balance of opinion; principal component analysis; Granger causality; short-term forecast; VAR models;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C32 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes; State Space Models
    • E32 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles - - - Business Fluctuations; Cycles

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nse:doctra:g2002-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: INSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inseefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.