IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Are There Laws of Production?

Listed author(s):
  • Gennady Bilych


Registered author(s):

    The article Are There Laws of Production? published in the American Economic Review in 1949 roused a great deal of interest among specialists, it has often been quoted and reprinted on several occasions. In the article Paul H. Douglas presented the results of his many years of studies. Having processed a great deal of statistical data, using the production function suggested by him together with C.W. Cobb, Douglas attempted to determine the share of labour and capital in the final product of the manufacturing industry in a number of countries and regions. The results were as follows: there was a surprising constancy in the share of labour and capital within individual countries throughout the research period and the returns from additional inputs of labour and capital were practically constant. For the US, Australia and South Africa the share of labour was close to 2/3 and the share of capital was 1/3. For New Zealand and Canada the share of labour was lower and capital higher, but the shares remained stable throughout the entire period of observation. The author suggested that results such as these could not be random and there was clearly a law of production, which may explain the current shares of labour and capital in a manufactured product. If we take into consideration the well-known fact that the share of consumption in the GDP is very close to 2/3, the conclusions drawn by Paul H. Douglas seem entirely reasonable and require a certain kind of explanation. Let us try to analyse the results obtained and respond to the question, which is as of yet unanswered: Are there laws of production?

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Socionet in its series Macroeconomics with number bilych_gennady.85552-011.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 09 Aug 2012
    Handle: RePEc:nos:wuwpma:bilych_gennady.85552-011
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:wuwpma:bilych_gennady.85552-011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sergei Parinov)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.