Re-reading Jevons's Principles of Science-Induction Redux
In this paper I try to substantiate the thesis that Jevons may have been too harsh on the vices of induction and generously optimistic about the virtues of deduction, as discussed, primarily, in his magnum opus, The Principles of Science . With this aim in mind the paper attempts to suggest (modern), recursion theoretic, theoretical technologies that could reduce and, under con- ditions that I claim would be acceptable to Jevons, even eliminate the inductive indeterminacies that he had emphasised.
|Date of creation:||2007|
|Date of revision:||2007|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: +353-91 524411 ext. 2501
Fax: +353-91 524130
Web page: http://economics.nuigalway.ie
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- R. D.C. Black, 1995. "Economic Theory And Policy In Context," Books, Edward Elgar, number 99, April.
- Francesco Luna, 1993. "From the History of Astronomy to the Wealth of Nations: Wonderful Wheels and Invisible Hands in Adam Smith's Major Works," UCLA Economics Working Papers 691, UCLA Department of Economics.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nig:wpaper:0129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Srinivas Raghavendra)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.