IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nev/wpaper/wp200906.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Asthma Medication Use and Air Pollution in California: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Griffiths
  • Nathalie B. Simon
  • Tracey J. Woodruff

Abstract

In this study, we examine the effects of chronic exposure to air pollution on asthma exacerbation through a cross-sectional analysis of asthma prescriptions for quick-relief medications at the 5 digit zip code level in California. Using information on the use of maintenance therapies by each patient, we are able to stratify our data by asthma severity as well as by age. In general, we find a positive relationship between asthma and both PM10 and ozone levels. We find that prescriptions for quick-acting inhalers for children increases with PM10, and this relationship generally does not level off effect except for mild intermittent asthmatics. Ozone also generally increases the number of prescriptions for ages 5 through 17, as well as for severe asthmatics and some moderate asthmatics at younger ages. However, prescriptions and ozone show the opposite relationship for the adults and the very young (ages 0-4).

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Griffiths & Nathalie B. Simon & Tracey J. Woodruff, 2009. "Asthma Medication Use and Air Pollution in California: A Cross-Sectional Analysis," NCEE Working Paper Series 200906, National Center for Environmental Economics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, revised Oct 2009.
  • Handle: RePEc:nev:wpaper:wp200906
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.epa.gov/environmental-economics/working-paper-asthma-medication-use-and-air-pollution-california-cross
    File Function: First version, 2009
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    asthma; air pollution;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nev:wpaper:wp200906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cynthia Morgan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nepgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.