IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/net/wpaper/2603.html

Reviews as Matchmakers: Dynamic Learning of Product Fit

Author

Listed:
  • Tommaso Bondi

    (SC Johnson College of Business, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA)

  • Lijuan Luo

    (SC Johnson College of Business, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA)

Abstract

Online reviews are usually modeled as quality signals, but their text also tells readers which products suit them. We study this matching role in a dynamic model in which majority and minority consumers care about partly different product features. As matching improves, each product’s buyers become more alike, and its reviews say less about the features that matter only to consumers of the other type. The unique equilibrium therefore features partial matching, sustained by mismatched buyers whose reviews cover what matched buyers leave out. In the benchmark model, uniformly degrading what consumers see never raises equilibrium matching. Pooled AI summaries of the most frequently mentioned features leave minority readers no better informed than a page written only by fans. Descriptive evidence from 11.6 million Goodreads reviews shows that review text separates fit from quality and that readers who like and dislike a book write about different things. This paper suggests that platforms can serve minority readers better by building AI summaries within reader segments and by not letting majority endorsement decide which reviews are most visible.

Suggested Citation

  • Tommaso Bondi & Lijuan Luo, 2026. "Reviews as Matchmakers: Dynamic Learning of Product Fit," Working Papers 26-03, NET Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:net:wpaper:2603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.netinst.org/Bondi_26-03.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • L15 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Information and Product Quality
    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:net:wpaper:2603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nicholas Economides (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.NETinst.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.