Masterpieces and Markets: Why the Most Famous Modern Paintings Are Not by American Artists
A survey of the illustrations in art history textbooks reveals that the most important modern American painters, including Pollock, Johns, and Warhol, failed to produce individual paintings as famous as the masterpieces of a number of major French artists, such as Picasso, Manet, and Seurat. Analysis of the textbooks reveals that art historians do not consider the American artists to be less important than their French predecessors, or judge the Americans' innovations to be less important. The absence of American masterpieces instead appears to be a consequence of market conditions, as changes over time in the primary methods of showing and selling fine art reduced the incentive for artists to produce important individual works.
|Date of creation:||Oct 2001|
|Publication status:||published as David W. Galenson, 2002. "Masterpieces and Markets: Why the Most Famous Modern Paintings Are Not by American Artists," Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, vol 35(2), pages 63-75.|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.|
Web page: http://www.nber.org
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Orazio Attanasio & Patrick Bolton & Hyun Song Shin, 1999. "Introduction," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 66(1), pages 1-2.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:8549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.