This paper studies cost of living adjustments in pensions from the perspective of labor economics. Evidence from longitudinal data on pension and annuity incomes of retirees suggests that pension COLAs are less important in the 1980s than in the 1970s, but that through 1987 they continued to cover about half of cost of living increases. Data from a longitudinal sample of pension benefit formulae and COLA provisions collected by the Wyatt Company for the fifty largest industrial companies indicate that if the 1968-78 decade persisted, cost of living adjustments would increase basic pension benefits for retirees by a half; while if the inflation experience were that of the 1978-88 period, pension COLAs would raise the present value of pensions by only fourteen percent. Simulation analysis allows an examination of the effects of pension COLA provisions on the key incentives emphasized in the pension literature, incentives affecting the retirement, turnover and shirking decisions. Pension COLAs are found to have very small effects on these incentives. Finally a simulation analysis demonstrates that when the contribution side of COLAs is taken into account, pension COLAs do not necessarily dampen the variation among generations in real incomes realized under alternative inflation shocks.
|Date of creation:||Nov 1991|
|Date of revision:|
|Publication status:||published as "Cost of Living Adjustments in Pensions", As the Workforce Ages: Costs, Benefits, and Policy Challenges, 1993 Cornell University: ILR Press, Ithaca, New York|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.|
Web page: http://www.nber.org
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Alan L. Gustman & Thomas L. Steinmeier, 1989. "Evaluating Pension Policies in a Model with Endogeous Contributions," NBER Working Papers 3085, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:3908. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.