IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/35601.html

The Impact of Suicide Hotlines on Health: Evidence from 988 Implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Hansen
  • Niketana Kannan
  • Jonathan Zhang

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of the National Suicide Hotline Designation Act, which introduced the universal 988 calling code and earmarked federal funding to suicide crisis call centers in July 2022. We use a difference-in-differences design that leverages pre-existing cross-state variation in crisis line capacity gaps, measured by the number of pre-988 calls routed to a state but not answered in-state. The rollout substantially improved crisis line operations in states with larger baseline capacity gaps: these states answered more calls in-state and increased their in-state answer rates. However, these operational gains did not translate into detectable reductions in suicide mortality. The mortality estimates are precise enough to rule out even modest short-run reductions. We also find no statistically significant improvements in broader population mental health outcomes. These findings suggest that expanding crisis line capacity alone may be insufficient to reduce suicide deaths.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Hansen & Niketana Kannan & Jonathan Zhang, 2026. "The Impact of Suicide Hotlines on Health: Evidence from 988 Implementation," NBER Working Papers 35601, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:35601
    Note: EH PE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w35601.pdf
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text is generally limited to series subscribers, however if the top level domain of the client browser is in a developing country or transition economy free access is provided. More information about subscriptions and free access is available at http://www.nber.org/wwphelp.html. Free access is also available to older working papers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H51 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Health
    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:35601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.