IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/35486.html

Learning and the Efficiency of Expert Referrals

Author

Listed:
  • Ian McCarthy
  • Seth Richards-Shubik

Abstract

Buyers of complex goods and services often rely on the advice of expert intermediaries who are themselves imperfectly informed about the quality of the available options. How well do these intermediaries learn about that quality and act on it? We study this question in the setting of referrals from primary care physicians (PCPs) to specialists, using data on 4.5 million joint replacement surgeries for Medicare beneficiaries. We first document substantial heterogeneity in specialist quality and costs within geographic markets, and we present design-based evidence showing that PCPs adjust their referrals specifically based on the outcomes of their own patients. We then employ a structural learning model of PCP referral choices to quantify the losses from informational frictions and to simulate possible reallocations with improved information. Beyond learning, the model also accounts for limitations on possible reallocations due to habit persistence and capacity constraints. We find that about one-quarter of patients would be referred to a different specialist in the absence of informational frictions, with small but meaningful improvements in patient outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian McCarthy & Seth Richards-Shubik, 2026. "Learning and the Efficiency of Expert Referrals," NBER Working Papers 35486, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:35486
    Note: EH
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w35486.pdf
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text is generally limited to series subscribers, however if the top level domain of the client browser is in a developing country or transition economy free access is provided. More information about subscriptions and free access is available at http://www.nber.org/wwphelp.html. Free access is also available to older working papers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • L15 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Information and Product Quality

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:35486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.