IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/35085.html

Le Bureau des Légendes: A Dynamic Theory of Double Agents

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Galiani
  • Franco Mettola La Giglia

Abstract

This paper models double agents—individuals coerced into simultaneously serving two rival intelligence agencies—as a finite-horizon trilateral game between Agency A, Organization B, and the Mole M. The double agent persists within a corridor of survival: a set of bilateral beliefs under which both principals continue the relationship. Under a linear-quadratic-Gaussian benchmark, we obtain a closed-form characterization of the corridor geometry, analytical upper bounds on expected duration, and three main results: (i) existence of a double-agent equilibrium, (ii) structural transitoriness— belief updating, terminal unraveling, and compounding survival risk ensure inevitable collapse, and (iii) comparative statics linking monitoring technology, punishment severity, and protection costs to expected duration. The key mechanism is self-destructive experimentation: B learns about the mole’s type through both the type-dependence of effort and the traceability channel γ, which amplifies this learning. Extensions establish existence under general specifications and show that duration decays exponentially in the number of rival agencies. Predictions are consistent with historical patterns from Kim Philby to the Cold War mole hunts. The setting—bilateral coercion, existential participation constraints, and Bayesian learning in a finite-horizon trilateral structure— defines what we term antagonistic common agency.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Galiani & Franco Mettola La Giglia, 2026. "Le Bureau des Légendes: A Dynamic Theory of Double Agents," NBER Working Papers 35085, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:35085
    Note: DEV
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w35085.pdf
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text is generally limited to series subscribers, however if the top level domain of the client browser is in a developing country or transition economy free access is provided. More information about subscriptions and free access is available at http://www.nber.org/wwphelp.html. Free access is also available to older working papers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C70 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:35085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.