IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/35021.html

The Empathy Channel in Fertility

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Galiani
  • Raul A. Sosa

Abstract

Being around babies makes people want babies. We formalize this observation as the empathy channel: exposure to infants in the social environment activates neurobiological mechanisms that increase the desire for parenthood. As children become scarcer, this affective stimulus weakens, further eroding the motivation to have children. We embed the mechanism in a two-group overlapping-generations quantity-quality model. The empathy channel generates a positive externality, since each birth raises others’ desire for children, making the decentralized equilibrium inefficient. We characterize the optimal per-child subsidy and show that the first-order Pigouvian rate substantially overshoots the general-equilibrium optimum. The optimal targeting rule follows a Ramsey-like logic, directing the subsidy at the group with the most externality per fiscal dollar, not the group with the largest externality per child. The calibrated model suggests that the empathy channel can account for 3–33% of the fertility decline, with 13.4% at the baseline. At this baseline, the Pigouvian overshoot is 23–32% and the optimal subsidy raises welfare by 0.22% in consumption-equivalent terms.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Galiani & Raul A. Sosa, 2026. "The Empathy Channel in Fertility," NBER Working Papers 35021, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:35021
    Note: DEV
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w35021.pdf
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text is generally limited to series subscribers, however if the top level domain of the client browser is in a developing country or transition economy free access is provided. More information about subscriptions and free access is available at http://www.nber.org/wwphelp.html. Free access is also available to older working papers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:35021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.